| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Kill ’25 by 25′ rule in Ohio
Credit: By The Intelligencer , The Intelligencer / Wheeling News-Register | news-register.net 27 August 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Warnings Ohio’s renewable energy mandate would cost consumers dearly were dismissed by proponents of the law, who insisted “going green” would create new jobs and benefit most Buckeye State residents.
But now, job losses and higher electric bills are a reality – and they can be traced directly to government attempts to shift power generation away from coal.
A 2008 Ohio law requires utilities doing business in the state to provide at least 25 percent of the electricity for consumers from “advanced” and “renewable” sources such as wind and solar generation by 2025. Compliance, being phased in, jeopardizes coal-fired power plants that provide economical electricity to households and businesses.
But utilities desiring to avoid fines for failure to comply can purchase credits from other firms that already possess alternative generating capacity. Earlier this summer an investigation found two utilities serving northeast Ohio had paid millions of dollars for such credits needlessly. The cost was passed on to consumers.
Job losses already are occurring right here in the Ohio Valley, as coal mines close or reduce production because of lack of demand for their product. Several utilities already have announced plans to close coal-fired power plants and change to natural gas.
A study by the Beacon Hill Institute of Boston concluded that if the so-called “25 by 25” mandate remains in place, it will cost Ohio consumers $8.6 billion in higher electric bills between 2016-25. Another study warned the rule could cost the state more than 9,700 jobs.
A bill introduced in the General Assembly a few weeks ago would scrap the renewable-advanced energy requirement. It has become clear legislators should kill the mandate.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=27374 ]
