News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Trick of the eye distorting turbine application photos  

Credit:  The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk 25 August 2012 ~~

Highland Council’s windfarm visualisation standards are scrutinised by Inverness architect Alan Macdonald, of Architech, who has published a book Windfarm Visualisation which calls for fixed standards

The visualisations in windfarm applications have been a controversial issue for many years.

Most of the visualisations currently submitted in windfarm applications prepared by landscape practices support the guidance produced by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) based on the science of perspective. However, this “science” is seriously flawed.

The main problem is that a single format is being used for two entirely different forms of assessment, which is open to misinterpretation.

If we look at the two photomontages, the upper image is the correct singleframe 50mm photograph.

However, in the lower image, the 50mm photograph only forms the centre of the image, which has been extended horizontally by stitching photographs together to show the wider context. This is typical of the field of view in windfarm visualisations.

To view the panorama correctly, it has to be viewed with one eye at a much closer distance. The importance of this exact viewing distance and the use of one eye is never clearly explained, so the observer naturally views the image from a greater distance with both eyes, changing our perception of distance.

In 2010, Highland Council took the lead nationally by producing its own visualisation standards, requiring the submission of single-frame images as well as panoramic images for professional landscape assessment.

The council’s standards have proved much more informative for the public and councillors, and this is supported by a recent Stirling University study.

As a result, Energy Minister Fergus Ewing asked SNH to undertake a review of their guidance to include images which are more suitable for public consultation. I believe change is urgently required so councils and the public can benefit from more realistic and accessible visualisations.

• Mr Macdonald’s book, published by Whittles Publishing of Dunbeath, has been strongly endorsed by Richard Burden, the past president of the British Landscape Institute.

Source:  The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk 25 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.