[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Prosecutor’s actions thwart transparency 

Credit:  Jim Timble, Franklin Grove www.saukvalley.com 25 August 2012 ~~

Lee County Board members John Ferrone and Jim Seeberg recently spoke against providing more public information on Lee County’s website [“Site falls short legally,” Sauk Valley Media, Aug. 14]. Ferrone actually called sharing more transparency with constituents “a lot of Mickey Mouse” (and Seeberg agreed).

State’s Attorney Henry Dixon is also practicing “anti-transparency.” He’s blocking all Green River Wind Farm public hearing testimony from being posted on Lee County’s website, even though complete electronic transcripts are part of official county records.

In his letter denying an FOIA request for this data, Dixon states the zoning board of appeals is “not required” to post any information, until testimony is completed many months hence.

These hearings are conducted in courtroom settings with a sitting judge/facilitator, sworn testimony, and court reporter transcribing all testimony. Citizens have the right to question the petitioner’s witnesses.

However, by refusing public access to the hearing transcripts, State’s Attorney Dixon effectively handicaps public questioners’ capabilities to prepare themselves.

Meanwhile, the petitioner’s personnel and witnesses, lawyers, judge/facilitator and zoning board members have complete access to these transcripts. This injustice is akin to a trial judge purposely withholding court hearing transcripts from State’s Attorney Dixon to obstruct his questioning of a witness (legal term for which is “abuse of process”).

In his aforementioned FOIA denial letter, Dixon did suggest questioners “order copies from the [court] reporter.” However, the reporter claims no authority to provide or sell copies to the public. In essence, Mr. Dixon is discriminating against the little guy by inferring that she/he must beg, borrow or pay for public records which can be easily uploaded to the county zoning website page with a keystroke (e.g., “Let them eat cake,” said Marie Antoinette).

The FOIA was established to protect citizens’ rights. Aren’t state’s attorneys and county officials elected to protect citizens’ rights, too?

Source:  Jim Timble, Franklin Grove www.saukvalley.com 25 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky