News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm sale on hold in Woodford County  

Credit:  By Cheryl Wolfe | www.pantagraph.com 19 August 2012 ~~

EUREKA – Gamesa has run into a stiff headwind in its effort to transfer ownership of the Minonk Wind Farm.

At issue is whether the special-use permit granted to create the wind farm is transferable to a new owner. The Spanish wind farm developer agreed in the spring to sell four wind farms, including Minonk’s, to Canadian-based Algonquin Power and Utilities Corp. in a deal worth about $900 million.

While Gamesa argues the special-use permit as written allows the transfer, opponents say the permit was structured incorrectly and in violation of the county’s zoning code.

“Special-use permits are not transferable, but somehow it got put in (this permit). If you sell the business, the special-use permit goes away,” said Woodford County Board member Doug Huser, chairman of the conservation, zoning and planning committee.

Gamesa Chief Development Officer Jiddu Tapia told the committee last week his company would continue to work out how to proceed with Woodford County State’s Attorney Greg Minger.

“The county ordinance says a special-use permit cannot be transferred,” Minger said. “However, the granted special use is in conflict with that, and (Gamesa) relied on that.”

Tapia told the committee that from the beginning of development, his company intended to sell the wind farm as it neared completion, likely sometime in late November or early December. Tapia said Gamesa would continue to abide by all the terms in the special-use permit.

“We are not a long-term developer and operator,” Tapia said. “Gamesa takes the risk to develop and construct the wind farms then turn them over to companies who want to operate them. This is essentially how all wind farms work.”

Huser said political maneuvering altered the special-use permit approved in 2010 into the document that finally was used.

“This just wasn’t a mistake; this was ramrodded through,” Huser said. “This is what irks me.”

Committee member Shannon Rocke said mistakes were made by a County Board with different members, a different state’s attorney and different zoning officer, so the current board needs to learn from the mistakes and move on.

“I think this whole thing is not necessarily (Gamesa’s) fault,” Rocke said. “The board that voted on this did not do this correctly. … This whole problem is because we didn’t do our job.”

Source:  By Cheryl Wolfe | www.pantagraph.com 19 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.