LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

‘Lowell Six’ go to trial 

Credit:  By Charlie Gorra | WPTZ | www.wptz.com ~~

NEWPORT, Vt. – “If people can learn anything from this case, it’s to organize with your community, organize with your friends and family to protect the places you love,” said Eric Gillard.

Activists against the Lowell Wind Project filled the Orleans District Court in support of six of their own.

The self-proclaimed “Lowell Six” began their trial facing charges of criminal trespassing. The charges stem from a Dec. 5, 2011, protest aimed at stopping Green Mountain Power workers from getting to the site.

With the six defendants side by side, the main question in court is whether the land they were on is being leased by Green Mountain Power, or if it belongs to Don Nelson.

Nelson said the land is his, and protestors said they acted with that viewpoint in mind.

“We thought for sure we were on the Nelson’s land, we had a string measure the distance, we had talked to a surveyor who’s going to testify later today,” said one of the defendants, Ryan Gillard.

A land surveyor, Paul Hannan, was the defense’s first witness. Hannan, considered an expert witness, said his calculations showed the land in question was part of Nelson’s property.

The defendants hope the case will benefit Vermont’s future.

“This could really set a precedent for other private land owners from having their property captured,” said Gillard.

Gillard’s co-defendant, Eric Wallace-Senft, spoke of his children’s future in the Green Mountain State.

“This is why I went up, because I want preserve some kind of future for my children in Vermont, my two daughters, and if we’re going to be destroying the land we live on we’re not going to be able to do that,” said Wallace-Senft.

Source:  By Charlie Gorra | WPTZ | www.wptz.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky