LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Opponents raise red flag over shipments 

Credit:  Reposted from Caledonian-Record via Energize Vermont 10 August 2012 ~~

LOWELL – Opponents of the Lowell wind project succeeded in alerting state utility regulators about potential violations in how Green Mountain Power is shipping wind turbine components across northwestern Vermont.

But the Vermont Public Service Board reminded the towns of Albany and Craftsbury and opponents in the Lowell Mountain Group that they don’t have the status to demand sanctions or an injunction to stop shipments.

The towns of Albany and Craftsbury only have status in the public hearing process over the wind project when it comes to impacts within their borders, the board stated in an order this week.

“No portion of the northern route passes through Albany or Craftsbury and therefore its use has no direct impact within the towns, leaving them without standing to bring the motion,” the board ruled.

And Lowell Mountain Group was not granted permission to intervene on the topics of public safety, municipal services or transportation, the board stated.

And even if they had standing to intervene, the board stated that they did not demonstrate how they are entitled to injunctive relief.

The board noted that this is not the first time that the towns have sought an injunction to stop the project construction in areas that they did not have standing to intervene.

The board gently chided the towns, saying that Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure require that “a litigant have a good faith and reasonably supported believe that a claim has merit.”

Source:  Reposted from Caledonian-Record via Energize Vermont 10 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon