[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Are wind farms bad for your health?  

Credit:  By Joanna Della-Ragione | Daily Express | www.express.co.uk/ 11 August 2012 ~~

Like creatures from The War Of The Worlds they frantically wave their arms across the scenery as if semaphoring to some distant ally. Not only is it impossible to avoid them, placed as they are but their ceaseless movement draws the eye from wherever else it may rest. Nobody with an ounce of respect for the countryside could have permitted their erection.

These were the words as long ago as 1995 of Sir Simon Jenkins, now chairman of the National Trust. He was describing a wind farm perched on the Cemmaes mountain ridge in mid-Wales. Once an “unsullied panorama of British landscape” it had been “defaced” by the construction of 24 giant wind turbines.

Since then great swathes of the UK’s greenest pastures have been ravaged, the landscapes not only assaulted by the alien structures but also by the access roads dug to build and service them.

Rare Red Kites from the Brechfa Forest play Russian roulette flying among the turbines of the Altwallis wind farm north of Carmarthen in Wales. Retired pilot Terry Neil and wife Kathryn live on Lan Farm two thirds of a mile away.

“We moved here in 1997 and found this place at the end of a little valley set in beautiful scenery,” Terry says.

“It was a place of great natural beauty and very serene. We moved here for that reason and then they put 10 of these things on the hill above us. We get shadow and flicker from the turbines and Kathryn has migraines she never did before.

There are 10 original turbines and we’re desperately fighting another development of 28. The new ones will be even larger at 426ft high.”

As their case shows it is not just the devastating blight on our countryside caused by the 3,209 wind turbines installed across the UK to date. Our health is also at stake.

Reports from across the world suggest turbines can trigger a range of problems from migraines and disrupted sleep to heart disease, tinnitus, vertigo and panic attacks.

Leading American doctor Nina Pierpont studied symptoms displayed by those living near such turbines in the US, UK, Italy, Ireland and Canada and identified what she dubbed as Wind Turbine Syndrome (WTS).

Rather than the high-frequency sounds produced by wind farms that can be disruptive but are relatively harmless, WTS is triggered by low-frequency sound waves or infrasound, which can cause visceral vibratory vestibular disturbance – abnormal stimulation of parts of the inner ear.

STAND directly beneath the rotating arms of a turbine and the chances are you won’t hear much. But depending on the topography, wind direction and weather conditions, a few hundred feet away it’s a very different story.

One person who knows this better than most is Jane Davis, a retired health visitor and midwife who lived on a farm half a mile from the Deeping St Nicholas wind farm in Lincolnshire. The eight turbines were built in 2006 and within three days of their becoming operational the Davis family noticed a constant hum emanating from them.

“We had issues with various loud noises and low-frequency sounds that created a hum in the house all the time, not just when the turbines were turning,” says Jane.

Within weeks they developed a long list of grave health problems. Jane’s father-in-law John suffered a heart attack and developed tinnitus, hearing loss, vertigo and depression.

Mother-in-law Eileen suffered pneumonia and kidney and bladder problems and husband Julian developed pneumonia, depression and an increased heart rate. All of them suffered from sleep deprivation. None of them had any significant health problems before.

Coincidence? Perhaps, but there have been further scientific studies carried out on the low-frequency sound waves the turbines emit and their possible effects on the body.

American professor Alec Salt, who has conducted extensive research on the effects of amplitude modulation on the inner ear, claims: “The wind industry has taken the position that if you cannot hear the infrasound then it cannot affect you. We disagree strongly. Although subjective hearing is insensitive to infrasound, the ear itself does respond to such sounds. In addition, after long-term exposure it is scientifically plausible that the brain learns that the infrasound represents an external signal and locks in on it. In our view, the possibility that wind turbine noise may have adverse effects on humans cannot be dismissed.”

Wind power companies deny the existence of WTS, saying studies carried out so far are “not robust”.

Jane Davis and her family sued Fenland Windfarms Ltd for noise nuisance in a five-year legal battle she describes as “worse than fighting cancer”.

“We finally got to court last summer. We had three weeks in the High Court and I was eight days on oath and five in the dock,” says Jane. “The case was adjourned so more noise monitoring could be carried out. But the day before the noise evidence was due to be heard, on November 29, 2012, the case was settled out of court.”

This is all Jane can say. In January of this year the family’s house was purchased by Fenland Windfarms Ltd for £125,000, 20 per cent below the valuation given by estate agents. It remains uninhabited.

Over the past decade especially, since the Renewables Obligation was brought in by Tony Blair’s government in April 2002 to ensure an increasing amount of energy is sourced from renewable resources, the wind farm industry has been booming. Not least because farms receive signifi cant subsidies in the form of Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs) for every megawatt hour of energy they produce.

IF WE assume a ROC is worth on average £45 and a typical large 260ft high onshore turbine in the UK with a capacity of 1 megawatt (MW) produces 2,628 megawatt hours (MWh) per year a single turbine will yield £118,260 per year in ROCs.

The largest wind farm in the UK, Whitelee near Glasgow, has 140 turbines so we can estimate it receives £16,556,400 per year in ROCs alone.

It’s no surprise investors have taken note. In the UK today there are 336 operational onshore wind farms, 69 under construction, 263 that have consent to build and 345 in planning. There have been so many applications to build wind farms we’re well on course to far exceed government targets of 30 per cent renewable electricity by 2020 – so much so that ROCs will be cut by 10 per cent from April 2013.

The problem with wind energy is that if it is not utilised as soon it is produced it is wasted. When there is no wind we have to rely on other sources including nuclear power. And when the wind is blowing at full force much of it is wasted because all the energy cannot be converted into electricity at once.

Wind power may have a part to play in our quest for renewable energy but our obsession is excessive.

Regulations should be imposed on the industry and an investigation of infrasound’s impact on our health needs to be commissioned with an agreed distance set between potential wind turbines and residential areas. The latest research suggests nothing less is required.

Source:  By Joanna Della-Ragione | Daily Express | www.express.co.uk/ 11 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter