News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Supreme Court rejects The Sisters wind farm appeal  

Credit:  By Mary Alexander | The Standard | www.standard.net.au 6 August 2012 ~~

The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by the developer of The Sisters wind farm, once again crushing plans for the 12-turbine project north-west of Terang.

Moyne Shire mayor Jim Doukas has welcomed the latest judgement, saying it was a “win for commonsense”.

Cr Doukas said the developing company, The Sisters Wind Farm (a subsidiary of Wind Farm Developments), had never managed to obtain a single permit for the project.

Moyne Shire planning officers recommended the development should be approved when it first came before the council in July 2009, but it was unanimously rejected in a vote moved by Cr Colin Ryan and seconded by Cr Doukas.

That decision was subsequently upheld at two separate Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) hearings.

“For it to get off the ground now, they’d have to apply for a new permit under the new (state) guidelines and it would never be approved,” Cr Doukas told The Standard yesterday.

Cr Bernie Harris, who lives in the district, said the project should never have come before the council.

“It was a shit planning issue that shouldn’t have gone anywhere in the first place,” Cr Harris said.

Local resident Linda Kenna said she was “thrilled” with the Supreme Court’s decision to deny another appeal by the company against the shire’s decision.

“We hope this four-year saga is over once and for all,” Ms Kenna told The Standard yesterday.

“These continuous appeals have caused so much anxiety in our community that we cannot rest easy until the 28 days Wind Farm Developments have to appeal to the High Court has passed.”

At its first hearing, VCAT said the project should be rejected on the grounds of noise alone, and used a new 2010 New Zealand standard to assess the noise impact rather than the more lenient 1998 standard that was referenced in the shire’s planning scheme.

The Sisters Wind Farm took the case to the Supreme Court, which found the tribunal had made an error of law and should have considered the 1998 standard. The VCAT decision was subsequently set aside and a new hearing was ordered on the issue of noise impacts.

However, before the next VCAT case could be heard, the state government introduced major reforms to wind farm planning controls, replacing the 1998 noise standard with the 2010 standard.

The changes also gave land owners the right to veto proposed wind turbines being built within two kilometres of their homes.

The Sisters Wind Farm argued that VCAT should base its new decision on the old guidelines because they were still in force when the tribunal made its first decision which was erroneous.

But the tribunal declared it had to make its judgement based on the planning scheme that was in force at the time of its decision and would therefore use the new standard. The company then appealed to the Supreme Court but Justice Karin Emerton dismissed the case last Friday afternoon, saying the tribunal’s declaration was made correctly.

“This result may seem harsh for the appellant, which has been deprived of the opportunity to have its application for a planning permit determined by reference to the more lenient 1998 standard through an error by the tribunal in its first decision that was apparently brought about by incorrect submissions as to the applicable standard made by council,” Justice Emerton said.

“However, the result is a product of the statutory framework for the review of planning decisions by the tribunal or, as the council puts it, the ‘building blocks’ of planning law, the tribunal’s review jurisdiction and judicial review of administrative action in Victoria.”

In its first hearing, VCAT also commented on the social division caused in the small community by the wind farm proposal.

“We feel that whatever our decision, the damage has already been done and that relationships within the community may never be the same again,” it said.

Source:  By Mary Alexander | The Standard | www.standard.net.au 6 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.