LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Without resident input 

Credit:  The Bethel Citizen | www.bethelcitizen.com 2 August 2012 ~~

I have been asked to write a letter by a couple of folks on the Woodstock Ordinance Wind Mill Committee because I have had personal experience with some of the folks that have been affected adversely by noise from the towers.

First, I want to make my position clear. I believe that wind power is one of the few viable energy options open to us as a people, and thus I am a strong supporter of these projects.

However, with that much said, I believe that it is unethical to erect these towers in places where people have homes or cottages because the sound from the towers seems to bother the people living closest to them.

I have been a volunteer for the Community Lakes Association Milfoil project for the last couple of years and have pulled milfoil out of the coves at both Lake Christopher and Shagg ponds.

This spring while kayaking on Shagg Pond with another member of the Community Lake’s milfoil project I was deeply distressed to witness one woman’s grief and outrage, and to learn that she and her husband as well as other summer residents had not even been notified that the project was being voted on in Woodstock last winter.

I also learned that day that others on Shagg Pond had been negatively impacted by noise from the towers.

From what I gathered from the Wind Ordinance meeting I attended last week this project went through without input from the residents who have homes or cottages on either Shagg or Concord pond unless their land abutted that belonging to the project.

I think it was the town’s responsibility to make certain that all of its residents were contacted. The argument that this town meeting was posted in the Bethel Citizen seems weak because some people don’t read the local paper.

Clearly, this oversight has had heartbreaking consequences for some Woodstock residents, and in the future we can only hope that the necessary ordinances will be in effect to protect all the people, not just some.

Sara Wright

Bryant Pond

Source:  The Bethel Citizen | www.bethelcitizen.com 2 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky