[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wisconsin Public Service Commission rules that Highland wind project doesn’t require EIS 

Credit:  By Jeff Holmquist, New Richmond News | www.newrichmond-news.com 3 August 2012 ~~

Developers of the proposed Highland Wind Farm in the Town of Forest will not be required to complete an environmental impact statement.

The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin issued a decision on the possible EIS requirement on July 25.

While the five-page document outlines several potential impacts that the wind farm project could have on landowners and the surrounding landscape, its conclusion is that there is “no significant impact” expected from the proposal.

Forcing an EIS typically slows down the approval process for such projects. With last week’s decision, final approval of the 41-turbine wind farm might come in the next few months.

Jay Mundinger, founding principal of the Highland Wind Farm project, said he was very pleased with the news.

Highland developers have worked with expert consultants to design and install the project in such a way that it would have little or no impact on the community, Mundinger said. He said the PSC apparently recognized that is the case as well.

“We’ve worked hard to protect the environment,” he said.

The PSC’s preliminary environmental assessment acknowledged that the large turbines would “affect the visual character” of the township. There may also be some increase in “ambient noise” near the turbines and “shadow flicker” (the blinking created on homes as the sun is blocked by the twirling blades) when the project is installed, the report concedes. There would also likely be some bird and bat losses as a result of the turning turbines, the report states.

But taking everything into consideration, the report’s author, Environmental Planning Analyst Kathy Zuelsdorff, concluded that the impacts are “typical of modern wind projects” and “would not result in significant environmental effects on the human environment.”

According to Brenda Salseg, spokesperson for The Forest Voice, a landowner group fighting against the wind energy project, those opposed to the plan were disappointed with last week’s news. Opponents of the project claim that turbines too close to homes can have a negative impact on the health of homeowners. The project likely would negatively impact property values and rural atmosphere found in the Town of Forest, she noted.

“To me, it says on one hand there will be impacts,” she said. “Then at the end it says no significant impacts.”

Salseg said her group was also disappointed with the PSC’s July 19 decision to deny “intervenor” funding to aid the citizen group in its efforts to stop Highland Wind Farm. The PSC sometimes provides public funding to support groups engaged in the project approval process which gives them a fair opportunity to effectively share their side of the story.

“We are very angry about this decision,” Salseg said. “It appears that the Public Service Commission may have already made up its mind about this project and does not want to hear from the very citizens who will be impacted most directly. We think that is an outrage. We call on the PSC to reverse its decision.”

Salseg charged that the PSC’s decision is a clear indication that the state is “pro-wind” and doesn’t want to hear the other side of the story.

“There is too much evidence from around the world that it is dangerous and unhealthy to live close to wind generators,” she said. “In many places tower setbacks are one-half mile or more from occupied residents, but in Wisconsin the standard is only 1,250 feet. That is too close, and we believe it will make some people sick and force them to abandon their homes, as has happened to some families in Brown, Kewanee and Dodge counties.”

Salseg said turbines don’t belong in areas too close to homes and should be relegated to undeveloped rural areas.

Emerging Energies LLC, of Hubertus, Wis. is seeking approval for 41 to 44 wind turbines with a total capacity of 102 megawatts of power. The power would be sold to Xcel Energy via a proposed substation in the Town of Cylon.

Source:  By Jeff Holmquist, New Richmond News | www.newrichmond-news.com 3 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon