[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New wind turbine planned 

Credit:  Express & Star | www.expressandstar.com 2 August 2012 ~~

New plans for a wind turbine have been submitted, taking the number proposed for the Staffordshire countryside to 16.

The latest proposals would see a towering 334ft turbine built in Shenstone, near Lichfield, just two miles away from another two which are planned in Wall.

Plans for two turbines in Tixall, near Stafford, were rejected at a meeting last night but could be resurrected by developers, and a further 11 towers are on the table.

Councillors and MPs today told of their concerns about the influx of applications to put up turbines, many of which soar to heights in excess of 160ft electricity pylons.

Members of Stafford Borough Council’s planning committee last night threw out proposals for two turbines at Lower Hanyards Farm in Tixall.

They would have reached heights of 233ft.

Councillors said that the “green” case for turbines remained unconvincing, while also claiming they were a noisy eyesore.

“Turbines are a blot on the horizon,” Councillor Alan Perkins said.

“The visual impact of these will be devastating on the surrounding area – they would be a tremendous blot on the countryside.”

Councillor Robert Stephens said: “These turbines are unsightly in the countryside.

“An electricity pylon is 50 metres high and the tower alone is five metres higher than that.”

Lichfield MP Michael Fabricant agreed, saying: “I am quite sceptical about the effect of land wind turbines and their ability to provide green energy, especially when you take into account they often have to be replaced regularly and are dependent on constant wind, which we don’t have.

“But my biggest objection is that land turbines can be an eyesore and produce noise pollution too.”

Source:  Express & Star | www.expressandstar.com 2 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky