[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wildlife kill data under scrutiny  

Credit:  Mark Anderson, Windpower Monthly Magazine | www.windpowermonthly.com 1 August 2012 ~~

Wildlife lobby group American Bird Conservancy (ABC) has filed a lawsuit accusing the government of withholding public information on the number of birds and bats killed by wind farms.

ABC submitted Freedom of Information Act requests for all documents belonging to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) department that relates to proposed and operating wind projects in multiple US states. In addition to bird and bat mortality data, the documents requested include pre-construction studies, all correspondence between FWS and developers or consultants, and any letters or comments submitted to other state agencies.

FWS offices in several states complied with the requests, but the ABC claims that Arizona, California, Florida, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Texas have not.

ABC wind campaign coordinator Kelly Fuller said: “The public really does have a right to know what’s going on with this wildlife. And the public definitely has a right to know what the federal government is saying to the wind developers. There were some projects and some offices where we couldn’t get anything,” she said. “Or they gave us some things and then never finished – months and months went by.”

The lawsuit is drawing renewed attention to voluntary wildlife guidelines issued by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in March. ABC actively lobbied for mandatory guidelines.

John Anderson, director of siting policy for the American Wind Energy Association, which is not keen on mandatory guidelines, said that ABC is an outlier organisation unwilling to work with mainstream environmental groups such as the National Audubon Society and Defenders of Wildlife, which aligned with the wind industry and spent several years formulating the voluntary guidelines. “My sense here is that this is a continuation of ABC’s drive to get some sort of mandatory regulatory process in place,” Anderson said. “It doesn’t seem that ABC wants to be a collaborator and rather just continues to muddy the waters.”

Sensitive information

Anderson said that filing the requests is not as simple as it seems. Some documents include proprietary information that developers fear will be misused. For example, a developer could use a competitor’s pre-construction wildlife study to convince a utility that its site is a better bet for a power purchase agreement.

“That’s the proprietary nature that folks are concerned about – the fact that you can take information out of context and make one site look more appealing than another,” Anderson said.

FWS declined to comment on specifics regarding the ABC lawsuit. But, although the agency acknowledges receiving ten separate FOIA requests, it said that ABC is seeking an enormous volume of documents at a time when government agencies are stretched.

“We take our responsibilities under the Freedom of Information Act very seriously and are working steadily with appropriate programmes and staff to make sure all appropriate documents are produced as quickly as possible,” said Chris Tollefson, FWS chief of communications.

“The agency has tonnes of other issues to address,” Anderson said. “And this may just not be something where they can drop everything and get to when they’re trying to deal with national issues of significant importance. There’s no conspiracy or secrecy here, as best as I can tell.”

Source:  Mark Anderson, Windpower Monthly Magazine | www.windpowermonthly.com 1 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.