LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Industrial wind needs discourse 

Credit:  Reposted from Rutland Herald | via Energize Vermont 25 July 2012 ~~

Rachel Ross’s contention that we not have a discussion on whether we build wind turbines on ridgelines because we are at 392 ppm of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is both fatuous and dangerous. Wrecking our defining natural resource is a Pyrrhic endeavor. It is indisputable that only about 5 percent of Vermont’s carbon dioxide emissions come from electrical use.

The collateral damage to our water resources and well-documented and increasingly understood human health risks should give all citizens great concern if these projects go through. The recent outstanding pieces in the Herald speak eloquently to the gross financial and environmental injustice that is perpetrated on communities that are victimized by industrial wind. A proto-fascist dictum that in Vermont “we must do everything (no questions asked)” will have a far more destructive impact on our state if we are to conduct our public policies in a way that precludes a rational discourse and understanding of our choices in creating a renewable energy future.

There is no evidence that ridgeline wind turbines decrease greenhouse gas emissions. However the massive amoMove to Trashunt of fossil fuels that are utilized to construct these turbines and their sites certainly are increasing Vermont’s greenhouse gas emissions.

STANLEY SHAPIRO

Ira

Source:  Reposted from Rutland Herald | via Energize Vermont 25 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky