[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

ACW council, minus three, listens to wind turbine discussion  

Credit:  By Paul Cluff | www.lucknowsentinel.com 24 July 2012 ~~

The K2 Wind Power Project was front and centre again but three Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh elected officials were not around to hear the discussion at the July 17 council meeting.

The meeting addressed various issues surrounding wind power but before that began, Reeve Ben Vandiepenbeek, deputy Reeve Neil Rintoul and Coun. Murray Curran arose from their chairs and left council chambers.

The trio previously stated that they have a pecuniary interest in the matter. Reeve Vandiepenbeek said it was not mandatory for them to leave but a decision was made to step out, as they have previously done.

“I have a farm leased,” Reeve Vandiepenbeek said.

Deputy reeve Rintoul told the QMI Agency that an ACW resident asked them to leave at a previous meeting, to open the door to more fruitful discussion.

“I feel bad in a way,” Rintoul said. “The pro’s and con’s are discussed in there. It’s not mandatory. If they want us to leave, we will.”

“But we are not to comment, period. One way or the other.”

Capital Power announced last August its intention to develop a 270-megawatt wind power project in ACW, adding to an existing wind power operation, also in the township.

ACW resident Jennifer Miltenburg, a wind turbine leaseholder, said it was her impression that leaving council chambers was an act intended to keep the peace between council and residents in attendance.

“I think that there is a certain sector that tends to make noise, so voices can’t be heard and to avoid that, they left the room.”

Wind power has proven to be a polarizing topic and every facet of it is debated by supporters and opponents.

“It’s a real sensitive issue,” Rintoul said.

On the agenda was a Health Canada announcement to design a research study exploring the relationship between wind turbine noise and health effects of those living near wind power development.

“With what the federal government is proposing to do, will they have the power to put the breaks on this?” Coun. Barry Millian asked aloud.

The provincial Liberal government has championed green energy, and their energy plans and policies include wind power. “Would Ottawa have the power to say to Toronto, hold everything,” Millian added.

Council received a letter prior to the meeting from Shawn and Tricia Drennan.

Mr. Drennan attended a source water protection meeting in Wingham, the letter stated, and picked up a map showing “our highly vulnerable water aquifers.”

Drennan said after studying the map, he realized the K2 wind project was clustering the mass of turbines around water resources and the transformer switch yard containing the close-to-surface water aquifer was dangerously close to the townships water recharge areas.

When council looks at a turbine location map, “they too will be greatly concerned for our water resources,” the letter said. The K2 project description did not address water aquifers or water recharge areas.

“To my astonishment nothing was listed,” he said.

The project description did note the potential to affect water quality of water wells near construction sites and ground water quality could be affected by accidental spills and releases.

“We the community are looking to our council for guidance on this incredibly important issue. These are the water resources for all ACW residents,” Drennan said in the letter.

Addressing council at the meeting, Drennan suggested hiring a hydrologist, “to see if it’s an issue.”

Coun. Millian said he didn’t see the harm in investigating.

“There are a lot of unknowns,” he said.

Source:  By Paul Cluff | www.lucknowsentinel.com 24 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.