| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Turbines cause ill wind in hamlet
Credit: Daventry Express | www.daventryexpress.co.uk 22 July 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A wind farm campaigner claims the approval for six turbines in a tiny hamlet has marked the “death of democracy”.
A decision was made by the planning inspectorate on Friday to grant planning permission for six 125-metre turbines in Winwick built by energy firm E.On.
Daventry District Council (DDC) had asked for more information from E.On about the plans, but this was not forthcoming and the applicant instead went directly to the planning inspectorate.
One of the wind farm campaigners, Sue Sherman from Winwick, said: “This is a truly terrible result – not only for Winwick, but for the countryside which is being ruined.
“If this can happen to a village like Winwick, in an area of special landscape with a high percentage of listed buildings, it can happen anywhere.”
People in Winwick had raided personal bank accounts to set up a fund to fight the wind farm proposals but it was all in vain.
Mrs Sherman added: “Many people in the village are describing the betrayal of Winwick as feeling like a form of bereavement.
“To everyone who helped us, we offer our grateful thanks and also our sincere condolences. It was democracy that died on Friday in Winwick.”
The campaigners will be looking to force a reduction in the subsidies handed to energy firms to build turbines and also a government review in to how wind farm noise is measured.
Chris Heaton Harris, MP for the area, thinks the decision should have been made locally. He said: “It is a disgrace that what has been approved by the planning inspectorate would not be able to be examined in public by the local council or talked about at an appeal.”
DDC leader Cllr Chris Millar, said the plans were considered by the authority for about four months before E.ON referred the plan to the inspector.
“I think this frustrates people and makes them feel powerless.
“If there were good reasons for this, you may not like the decision, but you would understand, but there is not as it is a low wind area and will involve the destruction of the area’s heritage.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=26000 ]
