[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Plan to double size of windfarm thrown out  

Credit:  By Cheryl Livingstone | The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk 20 July 2012 ~~

Plans to nearly double the size of a Caithness windfarm were rejected by councillors yesterday because of its impact on the “main tourist route” in the north.

The Forss Windfarm in Caithness, owned by renewable-energy giant RES, is located on part of the former US Navy site at Forss, between Thurso and Dounreay.

The company was first granted planning permission in 2001 for two turbines and they became operational two years later.

In 2006, permission to add four turbines to the site was granted.

Yesterday, however, plans to extend the windfarm for a second time by a further five turbines were recommended for refusal by a planning officer because of the effect on landscape and visual amenity, which he found “unacceptable”. Highland Council’s planning review board agreed following a site visit.

Councillors debated for several hours before deciding unanimously to reject the proposal because of its detrimental effect on visual and landscape amenity.

Committee chairman Councillor Thomas Prag said last night: “This was in effect a proposal to double the size of a windfarm which has already been extended once.

“This would have been a further extension and members were concerned, particularly because it is so close and very visible from the main tourist route in the north of Scotland.”

RES development project manager Graeme Kerr said: “This is a huge disappointment, not only for RES but for the Caithness community. Forss Windfarm already makes an important contribution to the security and sustainability of Scotland’s energy supply, as well as bringing economic benefits to the community.

“The additional five turbines we proposed would have brought further benefits such as jobs for people and an increase in funding to the current community fund which is in place.”

He added that the company now planned to consider its options.

Source:  By Cheryl Livingstone | The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk 20 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.