[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cumbrian council urged to get tough on wind turbines  

Credit:  By Julian Whittle | The Cumberland News | www.cumberlandnews.co.uk 20 July 2012 ~~

Anti-windfarm campaigners in Allerdale hope to beef up planning policies to make it harder for wind energy developers to get permission for turbines.

Allerdale council is consulting on the strategy and policy section of its next ‘local plan’, the blueprint that lays out what can be built where.

The Friends of Rural Cumbria’s Environment (Force) says the draft document is weak.

It has submitted a 17-page response, calling for a tougher stance.

Force says the local plan should:

• Set a minimum distance from residential property, starting at 500 metres for turbines up to 15 metres high, rising as the turbines get higher;
• Consider imposing a ceiling on the number of wind turbine developments in the borough.
• Take into account the “cumulative effect” of wind-energy schemes, including those for a single turbine;
• Discourage applications for medium and large turbines on farms;
• Emphasise that Allerdale has already made a “huge contribution” to meeting renewable energy targets and say that the preference for future low-carbon energy production is not onshore wind.

Force’s submission says: “We are not against genuinely small-scale, well-sited wind turbines, which do not harm the local amenity and supply energy to a farm or premises.

“What we are against is the inappropriate siting of large turbines, singly or in groups, where they adversely affect landscape and blight the lives of people who live nearby.”

Force also says the council’s document contains a glaring error.

It says the UK is committed to producing 35 per cent of its energy needs from renewable sources by 2020 when, Force argues, the target is only 15 per cent.

Marion Fitzgerald, chairwoman of Force, told The Cumberland News: “We think Allerdale’s attempt at the local plan is quite pathetic. There’s plenty wrong with it.

“They haven’t included a single policy that would help them prevent inappropriate wind turbine development.”

Ms Fitzgerald believes that Allerdale is “subservient” to the Britain’s Energy Coast initiative.

She added: “It’s a case of the tail wagging the dog.

“We are quite concerned that, by selling west Cumbria as ‘Britain’s Energy Coast’, we are making the place sound like a giant power station.”

Force says there have been 57 applications for wind energy- related developments in Allerdale already this year.

The group, which has 400 members, hopes that the Government’s recent National Planning Policy Framework will make it harder for developers to overrule the wishes of local people.

Previous applications for windfarms at High Pow, Wharrels Hill, Tallentire, Westnewton and Hellrigg were refused by Allerdale councillors only to be allowed by planning inspectors following appeals.

Force cites comments from Greg Clark, Minister of State in the Department for Communities and Local Government, in a Commons debate in April.

Mr Clark said: “Part of the purpose of our reforms is to move away from the situation in which decisions taken locally are overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.”

Allerdale’s local plan consultation closes this month.

A second consultation, on specific sites earmarked for development, will take place in autumn next year.

The council hopes that the new local plan will be adopted by January 2015.

Carlisle and Eden are going through the same process. Eden has completed its policy review and expects to consult on sites over the next 12 months.

Carlisle City Council is further behind but plans to consult on strategies and policies early next year.

Carlisle MP John Stevenson has called for a minimum distance clause in the city’s local plan to rule out schemes like that at Cumwhinton, which was turned down by a planning inspector last month. This would have erected a 328ft-turbine barely 400 yards from Cringles Farm.

Source:  By Julian Whittle | The Cumberland News | www.cumberlandnews.co.uk 20 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.