LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planning Board wants a say in Antrim wind project 

Credit:  By Ashley Saari | Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | www.ledgertranscript.com 19 July 2012 ~~

ANTRIM – The Planning Board voted 5-2 Tuesday night to submit a legal brief to the N.H. Site Evaluation Committee arguing that the local board has sole authority over subdivisions in Antrim, in an attempt to assert some local control over a controversial wind energy project.

“If the Planning Board is silent on this issue, I think it really sends the wrong message that we don’t care either way,” said board chair David Dubois.

At issue is whether the SEC has the right to make decisions about subdividing land to accommodate the project – a 10-turbine, 30-megawatt facility on Tuttle Hill and Willard Mountain. The SEC gave all interveners in the application by Antrim Wind the option of submitting a legal brief on the question.

According to Jesse Lazar, the vice chair of the Planning Board, the SEC has never before subdivided land to accommodate a development. But Antrim Wind has asked that the SEC make all decisions about subdivision, should the project be approved.

The project requires subdivision approval because an electrical power station will have to be built to provide electricity to structures that will be needed to service and support the turbines. The power station will be owned by Public Service of New Hampshire, which requires that such stations be built only on land owned by PSNH. That means a piece of the land would have to be subdivided and sold to the statewide utility.

This article appeared in full in the Thursday, July 19, 2012, edition of the Ledger-Transcript.

Source:  By Ashley Saari | Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | www.ledgertranscript.com 19 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky