[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

State needs sensible wind-turbine regulations  

Credit:  Timothy C. Reilly | www.ctpost.com 18 July 2012 ~~

Attention planning and zoning commissioners and all residents across the state of Connecticut. There is an important public hearing on July 24 at 3 p.m. at the Siting Council offices in New Britain. And if you care about local town control and protecting your individual property rights you will be there.

If the Connecticut Siting Council has its way soon you will have the opportunity to have a 500-foot tall industrial wind turbine and many others beside it only a mere 550 feet from your property. And there will not be a thing you can do about it, other than to suffer from the constant noise, shadow flicker (sun rising and setting trough the spinning blades), and severely reduced property values – after all would you buy a home next to such an industrial monstrosity? In fact, current law says that any industrial size wind turbine greater than 1 megawatt of energy is the call of the Siting Council and not that of your local planning and zoning commissioners. It’s apparent that residents don’t matter as much as developers to our state Siting Council.

From the fall of 2010 to spring 2011 I led a group named Save Prospect Corp., a band of angry neighbors, against a plan to put two of these 500-foot monsters right in the middle of a residential area in the town of Prospect. If it had been approved it would have been the most densely populated area for an industrial wind turbine siting in all of America. Fortunately, our evidence and strong spirit caused the Siting Council to deny the developer’s petition, something that has only happened in 3 percent of the applications/petitions before the Siting Council these past 40 years.

Part of our effort was a call for creation of statewide regulations for industrial wind turbines. With the help of our state representative, Vickie Nardello (89th district) and others we were able to get a law passed requiring regulations. As the saying goes however, be careful what you ask for. The Siting Council created regulations and totally ignored the evidence gathered and presented at great expense (hundreds of thousands of dollars to explain the obvious to the Siting Council) to many neighbors from both Prospect and Colebrook, where by the way the Siting Council approved last year plans for two 3-turbine wind farms in residential areas. The Colebrook neighbors are pursuing that action in the courts and vow to go all the way to the Supreme Court if need be.

What the Siting Council chose to do in response to the new law was to create wind regulations based upon industry-favorable siting requirements. States that have accepted development of wind turbines in populated areas are spending much time and money on the effects on neighbors who are truly suffering day to day. I have met with residents from other states (Massachusetts, Maine, Iowa) who have lost all hope, some have even pondered suicide, who can no longer sleep in their homes, but instead camp our in their basements. We found the Cape Cod Planning Commission called for a 3,000-foot setback for turbines, and much of Europe is now calling for a mile or more, yet the “resident-deaf” council members have decided that 1.1 times the height of a turbine is sufficient. So imagine having the Statue of Liberty right next to your house, times three! That wouldn’t be so bad since it doesn’t move, make noise and is inspiring! So when it comes to industrial monsters irresponsibly placed I’d have to say that residents don’t matter to the Siting Council.

The only standard we need to rely on in this fight is your constitutional right to protect your property, combined with your willingness to fight this outrageous assault on Connecticut residents and their local planning and zoning commissioners. I truly hope you all join the angry residents of Prospect and Colebrook at the Siting Council public hearing in New Britain on July 24. We need your help to save our state.

Timothy C. Reilly


Source:  Timothy C. Reilly | www.ctpost.com 18 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.