[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Anti-Viking group lodges petition asking for judicial review into windfarm  

Credit:  The Shetland Times | www.shetlandtimes.co.uk 13 July 2012 ~~

Sustainable Shetland has lodged a petition at the Court of Session in Edinburgh calling for a judicial review of the Scottish Government’s decision to grant consent for Viking Energy’s huge 103-turbine windfarm.

Energy minister Fergus Ewing gave his approval to the deeply divisive project in April, while late last month Shetland Charitable Trust – which has a 45 per cent stake – approved a further £6.3 million budget towards taking the windfarm to the final decision-making stage.

In a statement issued today by chairman Andrew Halcrow, Sustainable Shetland said it was seeking a “protective expenses order”. Its grounds for lodging the legal challenge include the potential impact on protected species and landscape and the fact that a public local inquiry was not held.

Such an inquiry would have been automatically triggered had the SIC objected to the project, but in December 2010 it voted 9-3 in support. Its planning department had recommended that the council should object on environmental grounds.

Today’s statement reads in full: “Sustainable Shetland, a voluntary organisation based in Shetland, has petitioned the Court of Session in Edinburgh to judicially review the decision by Scottish ministers to grant consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the Viking windfarm on Shetland.

“The organisation is seeking a protective expenses order, and is challenging the decision by ministers on grounds including the impact on protected species and landscape and the failure to hold a public local inquiry.”

Source:  The Shetland Times | www.shetlandtimes.co.uk 13 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter