Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Centrica criticises policy as seabirds block Docking Shoal wind farm
Credit: By Emily Gosden | The Telegraph | www.telegraph.co.uk 6 July 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Centrica has criticised conflicting Government policies after ministers blocked plans for a wind farm to power 400,000 homes because of concerns about seabirds.
The energy giant had applied to build two giant wind farms off the coast of north Norfolk.
However, while it was given consent to proceed with its Race Bank wind farm, which will generate up to 580MW, plans for another 540MW farm called Docking Shoal were rejected because it would kill too many Sandwich terns, a protected species of bird.
Centrica called the decision “regrettable” and said it had “already incurred considerable costs” on the project.
It suggested ministers had dragged their feet in deciding, pointing out that it had been “awaiting planning consent for more than three and a half years”. The Government wants companies to invest £110bn in new power generation over the next decade to help meet environmental goals and to keep the lights on.
Centrica warned: “It is essential that the UK maintains an efficient planning process without undue constraints on development if stretching renewable energy targets are to be met.”
Ministers said the decisions to approve Race Bank – as well as the nearby Dudgeon wind farm, to be built by Warwick Energy – would together represent about £3bn of investment.
The Energy Secretary, Ed Davey, deemed that a total annual death toll of 94 Sandwich terns killed by wind farms in the area was “acceptable”, although environmental groups said it should be lower.
The farms approved on Friday could kill 71 a year, while other projects already approved or being considered will take the tally to 93, impact assessments show.
Docking Shoal, the closest to where the birds breed and forage, would have killed “significantly more breeding sandwich terns per turbine” than other proposals, at an estimated 76 birds a year.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: