[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Moyne brings out legal big gun for wind farm hearing  

Credit:  Jono Pech | The Standard | www.standard.net.au 2 July 2012 ~~

A legal team costing $13,000 a day will represent the Moyne Shire Council at a tribunal hearing over Woolsthorpe wind farm permits.

Energy project co-ordinator Wind Farm Developments has lodged an appeal with the Victorian Civil Administration Tribunal (VCAT), seeking an order to endorse plans the government previously refused without amendments centred around noise control.

The New Zealand-based proponents are appealing to remove the additional requirements, and if successful the Moyne Shire Council will bear the costs of any additional damage to roads impacted by the wind farm’s construction traffic.

Mayor Jim Doukas said it was necessary to employ Maddocks Lawyers at the VCAT hearing to protect the council from greater potential costs.

“It’s better to be safe than sorry,” he told The Standard.

“It’s one of those tough decisions – do we try and save money and not go and hope everything turns out all right, but risk getting the wrong decision and think we should’ve done something about it?

“Unfortunately this is the way it works but sometimes you’ve just got to do it. I’m hoping the government goes in boots and all on this because they’re the ones involved.”

Deputy mayor James Purcell voted against the motion at this week’s council meeting, arguing the case could go to a higher court and drag the council into ongoing and expensive legal proceedings.

“If we go to (the) Supreme Court it’s $20,000 and could go on for days,” he said.

However, Cr Colin Ryan countered saying the council needed to be represented to control the discussions, especially at the risk of proceeding to higher levels.

“Doing this without any control is a dangerous approach,” he said.

“If it goes to another jurisdiction, that’s all the more reason to be involved at this level.”

Source:  Jono Pech | The Standard | www.standard.net.au 2 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter