[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Levington: Backing for wind turbines shocks MP 

Credit:  By Richard Cornwell | www.eadt.co.uk 26 June 2012 ~~

Suffolk Coastal MP Therese Coffey today spoke of her shock at councillors’ approval for two wind turbines in Levington.

“I do not get involved in individual planning decisions as it is for local councillors to decide but I had assumed as this application was in the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty that it would simply not be granted,” she said.

“I know that the local councillors worked hard for Levington residents and are very disappointed.

“In Parliament, I and other MPs pressed the government on this issue both on planning policy and on financial subsidies.

“Of course, we need to be more self-reliant for our energy and to reduce carbon but Suffolk Coastal is doing its bit with nuclear and off-shore wind turbines.

“The government has responded and has said that to accompany the national policy framework, councils can set policy on renewable energy within their areas.”

Dr Coffey said she was calling on Suffolk Coastal council to produce a supplementary planning document on renewable energy so criteria can be set for new energy sources.

“This could include excluding such sites in our AONB or making height references to existing structures. By setting out a policy, local residents will have clarity for the future,” she said.

Despite huge local opposition, in the case of the proposed turbines at Levington Hall, councillors felt no one factor was unreasonably intrusive and the cumulative scale, volume and frequency of the feared effects were not sufficiently significant to warrant refusal.

Source:  By Richard Cornwell | www.eadt.co.uk 26 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky