[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Levington: Turbines given go-ahead at beauty spot  

Credit:  By Richard Cornwell | East Anglian Daily Times | www.eadt.co.uk 22 June 2012 ~~

Villagers have been left disappointed today after controversial proposals for two wind turbines in a designated beauty spot were narrowly approved.

Despite more than 80 per cent of the population of Levington being against the project, Suffolk Coastal councillors gave it the go-ahead – but only by four votes to three.

Objectors said the turbines – 21 metres and 26m high on land at Levington Hall – would be a “deplorable visual intrusion” in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), as well as being noisy, and causing shadow flicker when the sunlight reflects on them.

Councillors and their planning officers though felt the turbines would have little impact on the AONB and would be hidden by trees from many public viewpoints.

The turbines will be on land owned by Dame Marjorie Scardino, chief executive of Pearson PLC, and her Pulitzer prize-winning journalist husband Albert, to reduce their country estate’s reliance for energy on fossil fuels.

Levington Parish Council chairman David Long told the south area development control sub committee the proposals contravened planning policies which said “great weight” should be given to protecting AONBs.

“It will be a deplorable visual intrusion and blight many residents,” he said.

Councillor Patricia O’Brien said: “If we don’t recognise the importance of an AONB, how are we going to protect our green and pleasant land?”

Andy Smith, cabinet member for planning, said he had every sympathy for the villagers but no one factor was unreasonably intrusive and the scale, volume and frequency of the feared effects were not sufficiently significant to warrant refusal.

Source:  By Richard Cornwell | East Anglian Daily Times | www.eadt.co.uk 22 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.