[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Solyndra foe trains sights on Cape Wind  

Credit:  By John Zaremba | www.bostonherald.com 21 June 2012 ~~

The congressman who led the Capitol Hill probe into the collapse of taxpayer-backed Solyndra is calling for an investigation of Cape Wind amid accusations federal air-safety officials caved under political pressure – saying both projects bear the mark of an overbearing White House pushing green power at all costs.

The hotly contested Nantucket Sound power project has come under fire after opponents produced bombshell FAA emails – obtained through a public records request and provided to the Herald – showing the agency felt political pressure to approve Cape Wind despite concerns its 440-foot-tall turbines would interfere with radar and ensnare small, low-flying planes.

“This is yet another example of this administration making dubious decisions based upon political considerations in pushing out these energy projects without conducting due diligence that would call into question their viability or value,” U.S. Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) told the Herald in a statement.

“It appears that an investigation is warranted in the case of Cape Wind to determine if the FAA acted inappropriately due to political pressure from the administration. Such an investigation would be conducted by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and/or the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.”

The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, which opposes Cape Wind, also has called for a federal probe into allegations the Patrick administration and White House bullied the Federal Aviation Administration into brushing off public safety risks and approving what would be the nation’s first offshore wind farm.

The Patrick and Obama administrations did not respond to requests for comment. Both have denied leaning on the FAA, saying Cape Wind earned the agency’s approval on its merits.

Stearns led the probe into the staggering failure of Solyndra, a California firm that filed for bankruptcy after it blew through $535 million in taxpayer-backed federal loans. His subcommittee’s investigation unearthed a series of emails showing federal budget officials under White House pressure to fast-track Solyndra and give their stamp of approval in time for a Vice President Joe Biden photo op at the company’s headquarters.

Stearns’ call for a probe earned him instant-hero status among Cape Wind foes.

“We’re very pleased that he’s taking a strong leadership position to look into how strongly politics have affected Cape Wind, especially when public safety is at stake,” said the Alliance’s Audra Parker.

She said her group sees “a pattern both at the federal and state levels to push green energy at any cost, whether it be taxpayer, ratepayer burden or public-safety risks. Many of our supporters have called out the parallels between Solyndra and Cape Wind in terms of the political pressure to push the review and rush the projects forward.”

Cape Wind opponents also have requested that the U.S. Coast Guard reconsider its own approval of the sprawling 130-turbine project, which would span 24 square miles in heavily traveled Nantucket Sound.

The maritime agency several years ago abandoned its long-standing request to shrink the project and create a bigger buffer zone for boat, ferry and barge traffic.

Source:  By John Zaremba | www.bostonherald.com 21 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch