News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Undesirable turbines thwarted at Caithness  

Credit:  Birdwatch | www.birdwatch.co.uk 16 June 2012 ~~

Plans for a wind turbine scheme at Caithness, Scotland, have been rejected by the Scottish parliament due to the likelihood of spoiling property prices and views of the landscape.

There was also the possibility of noise pollution, and a potential impact on wild bird populations, and all these factors would have made the development have too much impact of the surrounding area.

RSPB Scotland welcomed Scottish Ministers’ decision to refuse consent for the development, following a public local inquiry last year. A 77.5 megawatt, 30 turbine wind farm at Spittal, Caithness was planned, and the conservation charity believed that the proposed development would have had an adverse impact on important wintering populations of Whooper Swan and Greylag Goose.

Spittal Hill Wind Farm Ltd had originally sought permission for 30 turbines up to 110 m in height at the site, before suggesting a slightly lower figure of 27 in February 2011.

Stuart Benn, RSPB Scotland Conservation Manager, said : “We believe that ministers have made the correct decision in refusing consent for this wind farm. Although RSPB Scotland supports renewable energy developments to combat climate change, these must be located appropriately so that they do not harm important bird populations.

“In this instance we didn’t think it has been shown that, together with other wind farm developments in this area, the internationally-important Whooper Swan and Greylag Goose populations of the nearby Caithness Lochs would be safe. Predicted collisions of birds with turbines could have led to a decrease in wintering numbers, contrary to the UK’s international responsibilities for nature conservation.”

Source:  Birdwatch | www.birdwatch.co.uk 16 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.