[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine discussion postponed  

Credit:  (excerpted) BY MARGO SULLIVAN, The Jamestown Press | www.jamestownpress.com 14 June 2012 ~~

In other business, discussion about the wind turbine has been postponed to a later date, which has not yet been announced.

The planning commissioners had begun to consider the turbine’s development plan at their April 18 meeting but decided to hold off on a vote, due to insufficient information. They continued the discussion to the June 6 meeting because the town solicitor would be able to attend, but the development plan was not on the agenda.

Swistak deferred to Town Planner Lisa Bryer to explain the reason for the new postponement. Bryer said the state is issuing guidelines in July about wind turbines, including failure scenarios. Therefore, the decision was made to wait until those guidelines became available.

The Wind Energy Siting Guidelines Advisory Group is developing state guidelines along with the Renewable Energy Siting Partnership at the University of Rhode Island, it was reported previously.

Swistak and Bryer also said the project consultants needed more time to provide data and answer questions, which the planning commissioners raised at their previous meetings. The commissioners have asked for specific numbers about the potential impact on property values. They are also requiring detailed drawings about the electrical-connection plan and more data on the turbine’s height, the length of its blades, the setback distances to surrounding buildings, water tanks and conservation zones.

Additionally, the commissioners want assessments about the white light atop the turbine’s stanchion to indicate whether the glare will interfere with a motorist’s night vision. They also want information about low-frequency noise, including ways to compare the type of noise the turbine will generate to other sounds. They have asked for a comparison of the proposed Taylor Point turbine’s height to other turbines in the area. The panel also has requested safety records and failure rates, plus historical approvals and recommendations, including any action by the Coastal Resources Management Council.

The Planning Commission is reviewing the turbine development plan and will ultimately make a recommendation to the Zoning Board of Review.

Swistak said members of the Planning Commission had gone on a site visit to the Portsmouth High School turbine on May 31. The commissioners did not discuss the site visit, however.


Source:  (excerpted) BY MARGO SULLIVAN, The Jamestown Press | www.jamestownpress.com 14 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.