LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Distillery loses legal fight to stop turbines going up near national park 

Credit:  The Press and Journal, 14 June 2012 ~~

A distillery firm has lost a legal bid to halt plans for a 59-turbine windfarm near the Cairngorms national park.

Proposed developers Dorenell Ltd (UK) applied to build the windfarm on the Glenfiddich estate, in Moray, prompting a local public inquiry at Dufftown in 2010.

A reporter concluded that the scheme would make a significant contribution to meeting national renewable energy targets and that the site, 1.2miles (two kilometres) from the northern edge of the national park, benefited from a good wind resource.

Adverse landscape and visual effects would be localised and limited in extent and any impact on key industries of tourism, food and drink and their brand images did not justify rejection. He was satisfied that the integrity of the River Spey special conservation area and the interests of protected otters and bats would not be adversely affected.

The reporter recommended to the Scottish Government that consent should be granted and ministers followed the recommendations.

But William Grant & Sons objected to the proposed windfarm and challenged the decision in a judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh. The spirits producer, whose brands include Glenfiddich malt whisky, argued that the reporter allowed a decision over the need for the windfarm in terms of national energy policy and guidance to override important adverse factors. It sought to have a grant of deemed planning permission set aside.

But Lord Malcolm rejected the grounds of challenge put forward by the firm and dismissed the petition.

Source:  The Press and Journal, 14 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky