[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Chelker turbines ‘generate power for 23 hairdryers’ 

Credit:  Craven Herald & Pioneer, www.cravenherald.co.u 14 June 2012 ~~

“Museum piece” wind turbines at Chelker Reservoir, Addingham, produce just enough electricity to power 23 hairdryers a day, say villagers.

Peter Rigby, chairman of Parishioners Against Chelker Turbines (PACT) told Craven District Council’s planning committee that over a seven- month period the two turbines produced just 1400kw of electricity.

He said the electricity produced amounted to nothing and urged the council to take action under the original planning consent to have the outdated turbines removed. He also claimed figures being produced by owners Yorkshire Water did not match the views of residents who witnessed the turbines turning for less than an hour a day.

And he added that Yorkshire Water had not claimed its Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs) from Ofgem because the amount of electricity was so low, and not because of an “administrative error” as claimed by Yorkshire Water.

But the water company told the council that the turbines were producing electricity and as such were operational. And as long as they were operational, the council could not enforce one of the original conditions that the turbines would have to be removed no more than six months after they stopped working.

Councillors decided against taking no further action and asked for an investigation into what constituted “operational”. The committee was warned against a full- blown investigation because of limited time and resources in the enforcement department.

Committee chairman Coun Richard Welch (Cons) said he thought it would be difficult to prove the turbines were not operating, however little electricity they were generating. “From a layman’s point of view, if it lights just one lightbulb, it is still working,” he said.

And Coun Ady Green (Cons) added the council would look foolish if it challenged the water company. “It is still operational if it’s producing enough energy for one or 50,000 hairdryers. I think we would be foolish to spend any more money bickering with Yorkshire Water over this,” he said.

But Coun Robert Heseltine (Ind) said he had little time for Yorkshire Water and accused the company of not being entirely truthful with the council.

He said he doubted the operational figures produced by the company and asked for an independent investigation.

And Coun Alan Sutcliffe (Cons) said anyone could see that the turbines were little more than “museum pieces”. “We should spend a little bit of money finding out how much energy they are producing,” he said.

The committee had been due to discuss possible enforcement action at its meeting last month, but the report was withdrawn following evidence that Yorkshire Water had not claimed its ROCs since June 2011. ROCs are used to prove the generation of renewable energy and it had been suggested that the company’s failure to apply proved that the turbines were not working. However, the company responded that it had not claimed the ROCs because of an “administrative error” which had since been rectified.

Source:  Craven Herald & Pioneer, www.cravenherald.co.u 14 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky