LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge rejects attempt to block Speyside wind farm 

Credit:  By John Robertson, www.scotsman.com 13 June 2012 ~~

A judge has rejected an attempt to block a 59-turbine wind farm close to the Cairngorms National Park.

The farm on the Glenfiddich Estate near Dufftown, Moray, was recommended by a reporter after a public inquiry in 2010, and approved by the Scottish ministers, in the face of objections from a group, the Speyside Business Alliance.

One of the group, William Grant & Sons Distillers, sought a judicial review of the decision to grant consent to Dorenell Ltd (UK) to build the farm, extending to 21.5 square kilometres, about two kilometres from the northern edge of the Cairngorms National Park.

The Court of Session in Edinburgh heard that the inquiry reporter had concluded that the farm would make a significant contribution towards meeting and surpassing national renewable energy targets.

In his view, the effects on the national park were acceptable.

Grant argued to Lord Malcolm that the reporter had decided that there was a need for the farm at the site, and then was “anxious not to find too many things in the way of consent.”

If the balancing exercise involved a set of scales, the firm contended, the reporter “proceeded on the basis that the question of need held down one set of the scales.”

However, Lord Malcolm dismissed the claim. He said: “(The reporter’s) view was that ‘the landscape in the area has the capacity to absorb the proposals.’ I see no sound basis for assuming that this judgment has been tainted or influenced by the decision on need.”

Source:  By John Robertson, www.scotsman.com 13 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky