LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Some officials want to cap wind turbines 

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 12 June 2012 ~~

DIXON – Lee County has 232 wind turbines, and 60 more are proposed.

How many more will come after that?

None at all, if some Lee County Board members get their way.

During a committee meeting Monday, County Board member David Gusse, R-Dixon, said he had an issue on his mind that he would discuss next month.

John Ferrone, R-Dixon, chairman of the board’s Administrative Services Committee, said Gusse should talk about it now.

Gusse said Ferrone had made fun of his idea.

“I told you it was a dumb idea,” Ferrone said.

Gusse proposed the board cap the number of turbines in the county – something that wouldn’t affect current permits.

“I think, at some point, we have to say that we have enough,” Gusse said. “Maybe we have reached close to saturation.”

The southeastern part of the county is “pretty well blanketed” with turbines, he said.

Another committee member, Steve Kitzman, R-Dixon, agreed.

“Lee County has done its job in renewable energy,” Kitzman said. “There’s no more we can do.”

County Board Chairman Jim Seeberg, R-Ashton, also backed the idea.

After the meeting, member Rick Ketchum, D-Amboy, said in an interview that the county needed a “happy medium,” saying he wasn’t opposed to a cap.

Ferrone said he was against a cap because the county should be prepared for changes in wind turbine technology.

“To say we don’t ever want more, you’re closing the door on the future,” Ferrone said. “I have no idea what the future will bring, and no one else does.”

In an interview earlier this year, Ferrone said he found turbines beautiful. He said he would consider having turbines if he had a farm.

Last month, the County Board voted 18-4 against a new wind energy ordinance that the Zoning Board of Appeals had worked on for more than a year.

Gusse and Kitzman dissented.

Gusse called the board’s decision an “absolute mistake.” The ordinance would have been much more restrictive of wind farms than what’s on the books now.

Gusse praised Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power, which recently submitted the application for 60 turbines. He said the company is “fairly solid as far as ethics,” noting that its proposal largely complied with the rejected ordinance.

The county has set its first hearing on Mainstream’s application for July 5.

Chris Henkel, the county’s zoning administrator, said he’s “99 percent sure” that Tim Slavin, a former Whiteside County judge, will be the hearing facilitator. Slavin has filled that role for Mainstream’s recent hearings in Whiteside County.

The company wants nine turbines in Whiteside County and 19 in Bureau County.

Whiteside County has no wind farms now.

To attend

The Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals will meet at 7 p.m. July 5 on the third floor of the Old Lee County Courthouse, 112 E. Second St. in Dixon.

The board will have a public hearing for Mainstream Renewable Power’s application for 60 turbines in the southwestern area of the county.

For an agenda for this meeting, minutes from past meetings, or more information, go to www.countyoflee.org or call 815-288-5676.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 12 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky