LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plan turned down 

Credit:  By Duncan Bick, News & Star, www.newsandstar.co.uk 11 June 2012 ~~

A plan for a wind turbine which triggered protests among nearby residents has been rejected.

Farmer Neil Fell had wanted to build the 180ft structure – extending to 232ft including its blades – on land at Wheelbarrow Hall Farm at Aglionby, near Carlisle.

But councillors have rejected his application after being advised it would be “oppressive” to nearby residents.

That was despite evidence from Mr Fell to Carlisle City Council’s development control panel that money generated from the turbine would help keep his farm going.

Electricity from it would also be used to power homes in the area he lives in.

Mr Fell said: “This would not be a grab for money and then run to the hills.”

He also told the panel that he could remember the M6 motorway being built and the protests that surrounded its construction.

“Not all progress is bad,” he added.

Councillors were advised by case officer Suzanne Edgar to reject the application.

In a report she commented that the turbine would have a “detrimental impact” on people living in nearby properties “through an oppressive and dominant visual impact”.

After hearing comments from the public during at meeting at Carlisle’s Civic Centre, councillors voted unanimously to reject the application.

Details of the plans had triggered protests with people in nearby Scotby hitting out at the length of the initial consultation period, leading to that being extended. Of the comments submitted, 66 were opposed to the plans, and 40 were in favour.

Source:  By Duncan Bick, News & Star, www.newsandstar.co.uk 11 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky