[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

County planners vote to deny industrial wind turbines on private lands for Tule Wind  

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery, East County Magazine | eastcountymagazine.org 9 June 2012 ~~

By a unanimous vote, San Diego’s Planning Commission voted Friday to deny Iberdrola Renewables’ application for five 492-foot-tall wind turbines on private land under county jurisdiction.

The proposed turbines were part of the Tule Wind project, which also includes 62 turbines on U.S. Bureau of Land Management property in McCain Valley, seven turbines on state property, and 18 on Ewiiaapaayp tribal lands. To date, only the federal portion of the project has been approved.

“The Tule Wind decision was precedent setting in that turbines were denied on private land in the Boulevard area and the plan amendment was denied,” said Donna Tisdale, chair of the Boulevard Planning Group. “Today’s decision also bodes badly for Enel Green Power’s Jewel Valley wind that is proposed for about 7,000 acres both north and south of I-8.”

Staff recommended the denial, noting that the towering turbines were incompatible with existing community plans due to height. Planners also rejected a plan to modify Boulevard’s community plan.

Several planners made clear that they have serious reservations about approving any industrial-scale wind projects on lands under county control—dealing a severe blow to wind industry aspirations.

Commissioner Peder Norby voiced concern over “the equity of saying `too bad’ to two communities so that the other 26 can win,” adding, “It would be hard for me to ever approve large wind turbines on county land.”

Norby said he lives near a high-voltage tower in Carlsbad. “I look at a 400 foot tall tower and wish it wasn’t there,” he noted, adding that it is visible from 40 to 50 miles away on a clear day. He suggested that the 12 megawatts of energy lost by denying five wind turbines could alternatively be produced with a small solar farm, with rooftop solar on existing buildings, or with small-scale personal wind turbines.

“I don’t care about the economics. I care about what’s happening in the backcountry,” Commissioner Bryan Woods said of the precedent-setting proposal to put turbines taller than the tallest building in downtown San Diego into rural areas. “In the future, I will look at cumulative impacts,” he said, referring to more than 40 large-scale renewable energy projects proposed in East County.

Commissioner John Riess voiced concern over noise generated by wind turbines. “An A-weighted scale simply doesn’t work,” he said, recalling a pipe factory that generated complaints from neighbors despite efforts to sound-proof the building. “We need to deal with that and how we regulate these things for the future.

Noting that the Campo Indians want to triple the number of turbines on its reservation from 25 to 75 not far from the Tule Wind site, Commissioner Michael Beck also voiced concern over cumulative impacts and opposition to amending the community plan. “We’re being asked to make findings we cannot make,” he concluded.

Planners also voted to require Iberdrola to underground a power line needed for Tule Wind turbines on federal land. Placing the lines underground increases the cost, requiring blasting of boulders, while the project’s revenues will be decreased by removing the five turbines on county lands.

Commissioner Leon Brooks suggested overhead lines might be better for this site, citing potential for cultural resource sites to be disturbed. “I’m certain that will be a problem.”

But a staffer insisted that since the site is on bedrock, the chances of finding Native American burial sites is “highly unlikely.”

Tisdale asked to speak prior to the vote, but was denied, since public testimony was taken at a prior meeting. “They’re certifying the EIR with this vote,” she told ECM. “The PUC already certified it without a public hearing in April. It says nothing about infrasound or low frequency noise.”

Overall, however, the Commission’s actions sent a clear message to the wind industry: San Diego’s planners are not willing to allow the health of residents or the rural character of East County to be sacrificed in order to accommodate wind energy developers.

The victory for rural residents may be short-lived, however, since the San Diego Board of Supervisors ultimately has the final say on whether industrial wind facilities will be allowed on county-controlled lands.

The balance of power may shift when Supervisor Pam Slater-Price steps down in January after her replacement is chosen by voters in November. Candidate Dave Roberts has voiced concerns over wind energy impacts, while his opponent, Steve Danon, has championed streamlining procedures for wind testing towers and other development projects as a staffer for pro-development Supervisor Bill Horn.

With federal subsidies for wind energy expiring at year’s end, however, time is running out to gain approval of wind projects before the subsidies end.

Source:  By Miriam Raftery, East County Magazine | eastcountymagazine.org 9 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter