Please take a minute to help keep us online.
To preserve our independence, we are not funded by any political or industry groups, and we do not host ads. Wind Watch relies entirely on user donations, every penny of which goes directly to keeping the web site running.
Stripe: |
PayPal/Venmo: |
Legal challenge costs Wyoming wind project its utility PPA
Credit: Richard A Kessler, Fort Worth ; Recharge | www.rechargenews.com 8 June 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
US developer Wasatch Wind has postponed the completion of a 100MW project in Wyoming until 2013 due to legal appeals by an opposition group, which have forced it to terminate a power-purchase agreement (PPA) with the state’s largest electricity utility.
“We simply feel it’s best to allow the legal process to play out before proceeding with construction,” says Michelle Stevens, senior vice-president of communications at Wasatch. The affected 50MW Pioneer Wind Park 1 and nearby 50MW Pioneer Wind Park 2 are fully permitted, she says.
Stevens tells Recharge that Wasatch could not comply with contractual terms requiring Pioneer Wind Park 1 to begin delivering electricity to Rocky Mountain Power in October. Construction was due to begin this summer.
The Utah-based developer has prevailed in previous legal challenges by the Northern Laramie Range Alliance (NLRA), a powerful central Wyoming landowners’ group that includes oil and gas interests. The alliance says the project would depress property values, generate noise and visual pollution, and damage roads during construction.
Its latest appeal is before the Wyoming Supreme Court, which is expected to rule this summer. The NLRA is challenging permits issued by a county commission and the Wyoming Industrial Siting Council, arguing that Wasatch did not meet a council requirement that it has enough money to build, operate and decommission the wind farm. Stevens denies this.
The developer hopes a favourable decision will allow it to finish Pioneer Wind Park 2 by 31 December, when it is scheduled to begin delivering power to the utility.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: