LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge dismisses harassment complaint against Goodhue County farmer 

Credit:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, Rochester MN | www.postbulletin.com 7 June 2012 ~~

MINNEAPOLIS – A Hennepin County District Court judge has dismissed a harassment complaint filed against a Goodhue County farmer by an environmental scientist hired to do research for the AWA Goodhue wind project.

Brie Anderson, a Westwood Professional Services environmental scientist filed a 16-page complaint after an incident in March that occurred as she conducted a bat and avian survey on Dan Ryan’s property, where Anderson claims bald eagle baiting was occurring.

According to the affidavit filed with Judge Mark Labine, Ryan became upset that Anderson was on or near his property without his permission. Ryan called the Goodhue County Sheriff’s Office and blocked Anderson’s vehicle with his tractor until authorities arrived. Anderson likened it to being held “hostage.”

“His face was red and angry-looking and he yelled at me, with his spit hitting my car-door window,” wrote Anderson, adding that she’s changed vehicles and now refuses to work alone. She’s also requested a restraining order for two years. “I was afraid, and am still afraid, for my safety and security.”

Emily Duke, an attorney from Fredrikson & Byron, which has represented AWA Goodhue since 2008, argued her case before Judge Labine for two days in May before turning it over to the defense.

Ryan’s attorney, Dan Schleck, who has represented local critics of the wind project since 2010, got the case dismissed without even turning to his legal arguments. Schleck said that the form of harassment Anderson alleged, which is most typical in spousal disputes, requires physical contact; Ryan’s only contact was putting a hand on Anderson’s vehicle.

“The judge immediately agreed with me, and I didn’t even have to go into my defense,” Schleck said. The judge also recommended sanctions against Fredrikson & Byron to cover Ryan’s legal fees.

Anderson did not return calls seeking comment, but attorney Joey Vossen of Fredrikson & Byron issued a statement: “Westwood’s first and foremost concern is the safety of our employees, and we’ll act accordingly to ensure that.”

Source:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, Rochester MN | www.postbulletin.com 7 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky