[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Residents voice windfarm fears  

Credit:  CHRIS OLDFIELD 6 June 2012 borderwatch.com.au ~~

Up to 800 ibis slashed to death annually, data from broken noise monitors, windfarm noise, spooked livestock, plummeting land values, health problems a nd picturesque views destroyed.

These were some of the continuing issues raised at the Wattle Range Council Development Assessment Panel’s meeting this week regarding Infigen Energy’s proposed Woakwine Windfarm.

Speaker after speaker said Infigen Energy had failed to discuss or address their concerns and asked who would compensate them – council or Infigen?

Infigen Energy’s claims there had been no health problems from the Lake Bonney wind farm were challenged by beef producer David Mortimer, who revealed his health problems.

Similarly, Infigen’s claims it bad discussions and resolved issues with Millicent farmer John Mullins concerning his ibis rookery were also called into doubt.

Mr Mullins highlighted various report recommendations urging turbines to be kept away from Mullins Swap.

One report, unavailable to the public, indicated 60 to 120 birds would be killed annually from a flock of3000 ibis.

“The Mullins Swamp rookery has 30,000 to 40,000 birds,” Mr Mullins said.

“We are looking at 400 to 800 birds to be lost annually and that would be compounded annually because many of them will be feeding adults, and their young will die.”

Mr Mullins slammed Infigen’s claims the issues were resolved and encouraged DAP members to read Infigen’s report which suggested “habitat modification”, indicating that meant “moving the swamp”.

Retired farmer Graham Butterworth hoped to continue a peaceful retirement in his home of 65 years, despite a life-threatening illness.

But with turbines earmarked up to one kilometre from his home, Mr Butterworth said he was now faced with noisy and possible health threatening wind turbines as neighbours.

Concerned about shadow nicker from turbine blades, roads, noise and vibrations, he also worried about mobile phone and wireless internet coverage.

“The Infigen Energy Environmental Assessment has indicated that telecommunications will be affected by the development,” he said.

His neighbour Kristine Huppatz revealed a noise monitor had been placed on her property without permission or consultation about what it was for.

The device had fallen over and broken soon after it was installed, and she was told she could not access the findings of the data collected, even though it would be wrong.

Mrs Huppatz said she agreed with everything presented by Mr Butterworth and had “all of the same concerns”.

Wagyu producer Scott de Bruin said when out in the paddock working and the wind was blowing in a certain direction, “it sounds like a car coming up behind you”.

“You keep turning and looking over your shoulder because you think someone is coming, but. no one is coming/’ Mr De Bruin said.

He said just like people, livestock were affected by the sound and vibration of the turbines, and sometimes his high value animals were “spooked”.

“When you are looking at one it isn’t too bad from an aesthetic point of view, but when you are looking at 250, it just ruins the skyline.”

Wattle Range Council Development Assessment Panel (DAPJ yesterday deferred its decision on whether or not Infigen Energy could establish its proposed Woakwine Windfarm.

The DAP will meet. again on Thursday.

Source:  CHRIS OLDFIELD 6 June 2012 borderwatch.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.