[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Huron East protests use of agricultural land by industrial wind turbines 

Credit:  By Susan Hundertmark, Seaforth Huron Expositor | www.goderichsignalstar.com 6 June 2012 ~~

A unanimous recorded vote by Huron East council will send a resolution protesting the use of prime agricultural land for industrial wind turbines to the province and municipalities across Ontario.

The motion, presented by McKillop Coun. Bill Siemon, points out that the Ontario provincial policy statement states that prime agricultural land shall be protected for long-term use in agriculture, a fact that was recognized in the recent review of the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) program which prohibited solar ground-mounted projects over 10 KW being located on prime agricultural land.

It goes on to state that the same consideration should be given to the impact of industrial wind turbines on prime agricultural land, expressing “frustration and serious concerns with the Province of Ontario’s disregard of the provisions of the Provincial Policy Statement with respect to the impact of industrial wind turbines on prime agricultural lands.”

“I don’t see any legal challenge that can be made in us supporting the provincial policy statement,” said Siemon, while presenting the motion.

Seaforth Coun. Bob Fisher asked if the motion could include a request for the province to “cease and desist putting turbines on prime agricultural land.”

“Could we make it even stronger?” he asked.

Clerk-Administrator Brad Knight responded that since an argument could be made “the other way” as well, that stronger wording might not be preferred.

“I’m in support of this motion because it points out that the province is talking out of both sides of its mouth,” said Tuckersmith Coun. Larry McGrath.

Tuckersmith Coun. Les Falconer also expressed his support of the motion, pointing out that the municipality’s official plan requires as much agricultural land as possible to go with a farm during a severance.

McKillop Coun. Andrew Flowers first asked that the motion be tabled until a lawyer’s opinion could be sought.
“I don’t know what the motion says but I think it’s very dangerous,” he said.

But, after hearing the motion and the fact that Knight had helped in the writing of the motion, Flowers agreed with the motion.

“Did you write that Brad? Did you have your tap dancing shoes on as well? It is very well written and I will support it as written,” he said.

Seaforth Coun. Nathan Marshall asked that the resolution be distributed to municipalities across Ontario through the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) to ask for their support as well.

“The benefit of sending it province-wide is the people in Toronto get to see the province is talking out of both sides of their mouth,” said Marshall.

Knight said it would cost $600 to $800 to distribute the resolution.

The resolution will also be sent to Premier Dalton McGuinty, Minister of Energy Chris Bentley, Minister of Agriculture and Food Ted McMeekin and Huron-Bruce MPP Lisa Thompson.

Voting in favour of the motion were Grey Coun. Dianne Diehl, Tuckersmith Coun. Les Falconer, Seaforth Coun. Bob Fisher, McKillop Coun. Andrew Flowers, Seaforth Coun. Nathan Marshall, Tuckersmith Coun. Larry McGrath, Grey Coun. Alvin McLellan, McKillop Coun. Bill Siemon, Deputy-Mayor Joe Steffler and Brussels Coun. Frank Falconer.

Mayor Bernie MacLellan and Bru
ssels Coun. David Blaney declared a conflict on interest.

Source:  By Susan Hundertmark, Seaforth Huron Expositor | www.goderichsignalstar.com 6 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky