[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

“Cleaner energy” is destructive symbolism 

Credit:  Eric Rosenbloom ~~

To the Editor:

Re: “Cleaner Energy” (Editorial, May 28) – The growth of renewable energy is not in itself a sign of good. By the same reasoning, heart disease and diabetes are good since more people every year develop these diseases.

Renewable energy standards are fundamentally flawed. Their ostensible goal – reduction of carbon emissions or fossil fuel use – is not what they actually require. It is like making every suburban commuter strap a bicycle to the back of their car. Nothing actually has to change – the requirement is only symbolic.

Similarly, it is meaningless to say that wind generates, e.g., 20% of Iowa’s electricity. The question is how much less fossil fuel is burned. After 10 years of such wind “penetration” in Denmark, fossil fuel savings due to wind on the grid can not be shown. This seems to be because wind is intermittent and highly variable, so other sources must be kept running on standby or must run less efficiently with more frequent starts and stops, thus significantly reducing, or even canceling, any potential carbon savings.

But grid-scale wind energy is more than a mere symbol. It represents an unprecedented industrialization of rural and even wild places to collect the very diffuse resource, with not only sprawling arrays of 400-feet-high strobe-lit spinning machines, but also the wide strong roads needed for their construction and maintenance, substations to connect them to the grid, and miles of new transmission lines. Besides destroying both human and wild habitats, developers leave behind divided communities, where they expertly pit a few well-paid-off landowners against their neighbors, or even one town against another.

The result of subsidies to big wind has been only destructive.

Eric Rosenbloom
President, National Wind Watch, Inc.

Source:  Eric Rosenbloom

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky