[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Turbine plan refused at Maud  

Credit:  Buchan Observer, www.buchanobserver.co.uk 3 June 2012 ~~

Plans for the erection of three wind turbines at Upper Aucheoch, Maud, have been turned down.

Councillors at the Buchan Area Committee last week refused to grant planning consent from William Hutcheon, despite offers to move the site further north.

A representative from objectors suggested that the site could be moved further North therefore creating less disruption for neighbours.

Buchan area planning officer Wendy Forbes told councillors: “Informally NAB and BAA would be for a move to the North of the site.

“There are no guarantees that the planning would be put through even if a move occurred. We would have to approach the MOD, Environmental Health etc. to find out if the site would be suitable. A new planning application would have to be lodged for it.”

The applicant said: “There is not enough time to do it. Time scales are very tight.”

A new planning fee for wind turbines is being proposed for September this year and means the applicant would not have enough time to submit new plans and build the turbines before the deadline.

The fees planning authorities charge for onshore electricity generating stations less than 50MW is based on the physical size of the site.

Under the current arrangement this fee is £319 per 0.1ha. Under the new proposals, the fee structure wind farms would pay would be £500 per 0.1ha and other generation technologies would pay £1,000 for plants up to 100m-sq and further £500 for each subsequent 100m-square.

Source:  Buchan Observer, www.buchanobserver.co.uk 3 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter