[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind tower concerns continued  

Credit:  Sun Journal | www.sunjournal.com 2 June 2012 ~~

Recently I attended a public hearing in Dixfield about a wind tower ordinance proposed by the selectmen. The tone of the meeting was set when the selectmen declared they wanted a grid-scale wind power project on Colonel Holman Mountain for monetary reasons.

I don’t think they were ready for the 62 property owners from within two miles of the project and their very vocal, organized reactions.

Hart Daley repeatedly asked if the selectmen would reword parts of the ordinance to protect the Common Road citizens. Scott Belskis was very concise with his concerns and repeatedly came up with no answers from the selectmen.

The wind company CEO, Calvin Baumier, led most of the discussion. I addressed three real arguments against his reasoning for a grid-scale wind project.

He claimed that Carthage and Canton will have wind power. He argued that 4,000 feet from occupied homes is an adequate set-back. He then had Patriot Renewables’ representative try to convince those 62 property owners that noise of 45 dBA would not bother them.

I said, “Mr. CEO, I can petition for a moratorium tomorrow for Carthage and Canton. I have scales of rural sound from 35 dBA down to 18 dBA. Yes, we will hear them and it will bother us.” I also brought six sound-modeling maps showing that a one mile set-back is not enough.

The meeting ended without resolution. Once again, Colonel Holman Mountain residents were let down.

A moratorium petition will be at Dixfield’s polls on June 12.

Alice McKay Barnett, Dixfield,

Source:  Sun Journal | www.sunjournal.com 2 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: