LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners welcome landmark wind farm ruling 

Credit:  Philip Case, Farmers Weekly, www.fwi.co.uk 31 May 2012 ~~

Green campaigners have welcomed a High Court ruling that rejected plans for four large wind turbines in Norfolk.

A judge ruled out plans to build 105m (344ft) turbines near Hemsby in favour of conserving the local countryside.

Sea & Land Power and Energy Ltd had wanted to build the four turbines near Great Yarmouth to supply power to more than 5,000 homes and help meet the government’s renewable energy targets.

The company’s plans were rejected by the local council in 2009, whose decision has now been upheld by the High Court.

Explaining her decision, Mrs Justice Lang said the turbines would harm the character and appearance of the landscape

The judge added the government’s renewable energy targets do not outweigh the value of the beauty of the countryside.

Jubilant residents, local councils and conservation groups who were opposed to the plans have welcomed the landmark judgment.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England said the ruling was “highly significant”. Those fighting wind turbines in the future will likely cite the case.

Tom Leveridge, senior energy campaigner for the CPRE, said: “The countryside should play an important role in tackling climate change, but we need to find a better balance between cutting carbon and protecting important landscapes.

“This application was another example of giant turbines being proposed in an inappropriate location.

“Mrs Justice Lang’s decision will reassure other local communities keen to protect valued landscapes but who feel like their concerns are increasingly being ignored as a result of government energy policy.

“Local communities need to be empowered to decide for themselves how they want to contribute to tackling climate change including by identifying those areas where onshore wind is, and isn’t, appropriate.”

Source:  Philip Case, Farmers Weekly, www.fwi.co.uk 31 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky