[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Planners reject bid for an 80m wind turbine at Drigg 

Credit:  By Andrew Clarke, The Whitehaven News, www.whitehavennews.co.uk 31 May 2012 ~~

Controversial plans for a wind turbine in Drigg have been unanimously turned down by planners.

They ruled at a meeting last week that the 80m-high turbine, earmarked for land at Drigg Moorside Farm, would have a “harmful effect” on the landscape.

The meeting heard from seven local residents, who gave various objections against the plan, claiming that the turbine would be a “blot on the landscape”.

One of the objectors, Susan White, said: “This would ruin the wonderful views and have a huge impact on the residents of Drigg.

“It would be visible to anyone enjoying the beauty of the National Park, and it would set a frightening precedent as a lot more landowners would be applying which would create a windfarm and cause the destruction on this beautiful and tranquil area.”

Another objector, John Thompson, added: “This would have a harmful effect on the irreplaceable wildlife in this area.”

Further objections came from the parish councils of Drigg & Carleton, Seascale, Gosforth and Muncaster, in addition to Ravenglass Village Forum, Lake District National Park and Friends of the Lake District.

Collective grounds of objection included visual impact, size, noise, safety and that it will “irreversibly alter the character of the area and affect tourism”.

The purpose of the turbine would be to reduce the farm’s financial overheads and carbon footprint.

All nine councillors voted to turn the plans down.

Coun John Jackson said: “It is claimed that site will be restored after 25 years, but this would not be possible due to the size of the foundations.”

Coun Geoff Blackwell added: “From the site visit we carried out we got a good feel for the visual impact this would have.”

Source:  By Andrew Clarke, The Whitehaven News, www.whitehavennews.co.uk 31 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky