LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hammond submits comments on Article X 

Credit:  By AMANDA PURCELL, The Journal | www.ogd.com 31 May 2012 ~~

HAMMOND – Hammond town officials have submitted comments contesting wind regulations outlined in Article X of the 2011 Power NY Act.

The town council submitted their comments Friday. Regulations under the Article X energy law could override local planning boards and zoning codes in regards to the placement of wind turbines and farms, said Town Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram.

“There were two issues first being home rule… and the other being the lack of sound standards,” said Mr. Bertram.

Council members argue that the C-weighted, or low-frequency sound, produced by wind turbines can have negative impacts on the town.

“They are not taking that into consideration – that is the major factor in placement of wind turbines,” said council member Douglas E. Delosh.

Council members passed its Wind Energy Facilities law in 2009 – which was revised in 2011 – limiting the placement of wind turbines within the town.

“They are taking the siting process away from the town,” Mr. Bertram said. “They could or could not choose to follow our standards.”

Article X establishes a board to review the local wind laws and determine whether local laws are too restrictive.

“The decisions will be made by seven or nine board members, with two representatives from our area,” said Mr. Delosh. “But they cannot be government officials from our town. We can only hope they act in the best interest of the community’s health, safety and welfare.”

Mr. Bertram said the council remains optimistic that the board’s comments will affect Article X.

“I think the Article’s siting process is a good step in the right direction,” said Mr. Bertram. “Many people at the local level don’t have the local expertise to manage alternative energy such as power plant, nuclear project or wind farms. It is not a bad thing for the state be involved in streamlining the process but I don’t think it should superseded local regulations.”

Municipalities have until June 15 to file comments with the state Public Service Commission contesting or calling to strengthen the law. The deadline for filing public comments was Tuesday.

Source:  By AMANDA PURCELL, The Journal | www.ogd.com 31 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky