LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hemsby wind turbine High Court ruling ‘highly significant’ says CPRE 

Credit:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 30 May 2012 ~~

A High Court ruling rejecting plans for four wind turbines in Norfolk could set a legal precedent, the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has said.

Plans to build 105m (344ft) turbines near Hemsby were rejected on Tuesday in favour of local conservation policy.

CPRE East spokesman David Williams said: “The High Court judge has quashed the idea that national targets have precedent over local concerns.”

A renewable energy industry spokesman said it was not “unduly worried”.

Great Yarmouth Borough Council refused plans from Sea & Land Power and Energy Ltd for the turbines in 2009 over concerns about the adverse impact on the landscape.

The company took the appeal against the council’s decision to the High Court after it was turned down by the Planning Inspectorate.

Mr Williams said: “I think this is a highly significant ruling.

“I think it will cause unrest to several wind farm companies because it’s reasserting the importance of local people’s feelings towards their landscape.

“It’ll still be a balancing act between national targets and local concerns, but it’s upped the ante to help local campaigners who think turbines of 100m (328ft) plus will have a negative outlook in their area.”

The turbines would have stood in an area directly to the east and south of the Broads, with the Norfolk Coast, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, also just 1.8 miles (3km) away.

Robert Norris, from Renewable UK, which represents the wind, wave and tidal energy industries, said: “We’re not unduly worried as we’ve always said every application for development needs to be considered on a case-by-case basis – some we win, some we lose.

“This will continue to be the case, despite judgements like this, because the government has made it clear that although all the environmental impact is an important consideration, another consideration is how are we going to generate enough electricity.”

Source:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 30 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky