LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ocotillo Wind Express construction to continue 

Credit:  By ALEJANDRO DAVILA, Staff Writer | Imperial Valley Press | www.ivpressonline.com 23 May 2012 ~~

A temporary restraining order against a 112-wind-turbine project set to be built east of Ocotillo was denied by federal judge, a county official said Wednesday.

This decision comes more than a week after the Quechan Indian Tribe filed suit against the Department of the Interior for awarding a right-of-way to the project’s developer.

Environmentalists and some Ocotillo residents have been opposing the project along with Native American tribes.

Tribes say the project permanently impacts cultural and archaeological resources, that mitigation efforts are insufficient and that the whole process lacked so-called meaningful consultation.

The decision denying the temporary restraining order to Pattern Energy’s wind energy project was issued Tuesday in San Diego, said Armando Villa, director of the Imperial County Planning Department.

The judge deemed that enough had been done to protect cultural resources, he said.

With this ruling, construction of the industrial wind farm is expected to continue.

“Obviously, I’m disappointed in the decision,” said John Bathke, Quechan Tribe historic preservation officer.

The judge seems to find a memorandum of agreement between the Bureau of Land Management and Pattern regarding how to deal with archaeological remains to be sufficient, Bathke said.

Unfortunately, tribal governments aren’t a required signatory party on the memorandum of agreement, he said.

Bathke also said tribes were “rushed to offer comments on this memorandum of agreement,” and that even when comments and corrections were made, “we do not agree to the mitigation (plans).”

“Tribal governments, in the legal sense, are not really a party to this MOA,” he said.

“We are pleased with the court’s decision,” said Mike Garland, Pattern’s chief executive officer in a written statement, adding, “this vital renewable energy facility is bringing up to 370 jobs to Imperial County and creating a significant new source of clean energy for Southern California.”

But even when the temporary restraining order was denied, the tribes are still pursuing a full injunction, and this, Bathke said, is a longer and “heavier” process

[ends]

Source:  By ALEJANDRO DAVILA, Staff Writer | Imperial Valley Press | www.ivpressonline.com 23 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon