[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge denies temporary restraining order for Ocotillo Express wind project 

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | eastcountymagazine.org 23 May 2012 ~~

Dashing hopes of tribal members hoping to halt destruction of the desert and desecration of the ancestor’s graves, United States District Judge William Q. Hayes has denied a temporary restraining order sought by the Quechan Indians to halt the Ocotillo Express wind project.

During a hearing Friday in San Diego, Quechan’s attorney told Judge Hayes that applicant Pattern Energy effectively argued that for a renewable energy project to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all that’s required is to study the impact—not to take action to address impacts found by the study “no matter what it shows, even if not one living thing would survive on the land.”

The Environmental Impacts Study showed significant impacts to cultural and biological resources on the land, owned by the federal Bureau of Land Management and designed as class L, for low-impact usages.

“Are there ANY limits that apply to development of renewable energy on class L lands?” the tribe’s attorney asked.

Quechan contends the project will cause irreparable harm to hundreds of cites including burial and cremation sites, as well as tens of thousands of artifacts. Forensic dog teams hired by tribes last week found six new cremation sites. Tribal members, who in modern times have continued to use the site for ceremonial purposes, also sought to protect views of mountains sacred in their religious beliefs of creation.

Arguing for the government, a BLM lawyer brazenly argued that “scenic value is not protected” on any class-L lands. BLM contended that irreparable harm would not occur and that the new discoveries would be protected and assessed.

Quechan’s attorney retorted, “They’re out there with bulldozers and graders.” He said there is a high likelihood of more subsurface discoveries—but only if the bulldozers are stopped before everything not yet discovered is destroyed.

He also raised serious questions on the merits of the projects. Both sides predict that they will prevail when the merits of the case are heard.

“What they want to do is build the project while this case is being litigated,” Quechan’s lawyer argued, adding that Pattern would likely claim it is “inequitable” to ask it to tear down the wind facility once built. The tribe has won a land use case in the past on similar grounds, he said, arguing that the BLM failed to consult with the tribe. “They were certainly on notice.” The BLM contends that the tribe was notified but did not participate in consultations.

Other tribes including Viejas have said they were consulted, but that those consultations were “meaningless” as concerns were largely not addressed.

Quechan’s attorney also argued for a public interest in protecting the land and natural resources. “They want to build renewable energy projects wherever they want.”

BLM’s attorney contended that there is a “strong national priority to build renewable resources on public lands” and argued that “multiple use land can be a power plant or electrical generation.” The attorney noted that the Ocotillo site already has two high-voltage power lines and is designated as an “energy corridor.” The government’s lawyer insisted it is “not a pristine desert,” contradicting numerous statements to the contrary made by environmental organizations in recent media reports, including the Desert Protective Council.

Patterns’ lawyer informed the Judge that subsidies for wind energy expire at year’s end. “If we miss the deadline, we lose $130 million.”

The attorney for Quechan concluded by addressing the court. “If a temporary restraining order is not issued, if we are successful [on the merits] we will be asking you to remove the turbines.”

Denying the temporary restraining order without prejudice, the Judge concluded that the plaintiff failed to “show that the balance of hardships tips sharply in its favor.” Judge Hayes ordered parties to contact the Magistrate Judge immediately to confer on an expedited motion for preliminary injunction or an expedited motion for summary judgment.

To Native American tribal members and others anguished over the destruction of the desert and desecration of ancestral graves, the decision came as a painful blow.

Meanwhile, construction continues in Ocotillo at a rapid pace even as area residents assert and have documented numerous apparent violations of air and water quality laws, wildlife protections and devastation more expansive than indicated in the final project approval documents.

Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | eastcountymagazine.org 23 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky