[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

It’s a ridge too far for local villagers  

Credit:  www.buckinghamtoday.co.uk 19 May 2012 ~~

The attention of the district’s wind farm opposition was focused on Towcester this week during the opening of a planning inquiry into a project near Helmdon.

On Tuesday Government appointed inspector Elizabeth Fieldhouse officially opened the inquiry at the South Northants Council chamber into proposals for five 125m turbines at Spring Farm Ridge, just off the B4525. The inquiry was called after SNC’s development control committee refused permission for the proposal by Broadview Energy last June.

Around 30 members of the Helmdon, Stuchbury and Greatworth Wind Action Group (HSGWAG) listened to opening remarks made barristers from both sides. They were joined by at least two people from other south Northants villages who are preparing to fight proposals in their own areas.

John Barnes of Paulerpsury Parish Council was at the inquiry while the Tove Action Group oppose pre-planning proposals for upto 16 turbines between the Towcester Racecourse, Shutlanger, Paulerspury, Alderton and Stoke Park.

Mr Barnes said there were many in the district keeping a close eye on the inquiry, adding: “There’s an assumption there is man made climate change and that we can do something about. Therefore government policy is we must have wind turbines.”

Speaking for Broadview, David Hardy told the inquiry that national policy was in favour of wind farms and concluded: “There is nothing so special or out of the ordinary here at Spring Farm Ridge to suggest that the likely significant environmental effects would be unacceptable in the public interest which the planning system is there to preserve.”

Source:  www.buckinghamtoday.co.uk 19 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter