[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Growing doubts about Uruguay’s goal of 1.2GW wind power by 2015  

Credit:  Merco Press | en.mercopress.com | 18 May 2012 ~~

Uruguay’s ambition to have 1.2GW of wind power in operation by 2015 may have to be delayed for several years because logistical problems and tightening returns could make some projects unfeasible.

Even the Energy Director Ramón Méndez, admits that not all projects being contracted today might be built, despite the country’s urgent need for more power.

But “we still have the 500MW goal”, Méndez insisted referring to Uruguay’s original wind target, a big step up from the 43MW in operation now.

Wind suddenly became a hot commodity last year, when the government saw how cheaply it could contract projects. It quickly set its sights sky-high, attempting to contract as much as the grid can handle, at breakneck speed.

But with developers having dropped asking rates by 30 dollars per MWh in some cases, and given the enormous logistical challenges they will face in trying to come on line on time, some projects might never grow to fruition. As one government source admits: “Some of these projects are a little bit bogus.”

Uruguay was mighty pleased to receive asking rates of 63.50/MWh in its August 2011 tender. In the previous tender, signed off in January that year, prices had come in at a low of 81.16/MWh.

There were three main reasons behind the steep drop in price: a bonus of 110/MWh being offered for all energy produced until January 2015; the stiff competition; and the influence of Brazil’s tenders producing low-tariff electricity contracts.

To take advantage of the cheap rates, a tender was announced in November, before being quickly scrapped in favour of a faster method of directly contracting those projects that failed to secure deals in the second tender, providing they were willing to accept a rate of 63.50 dollars per MWh, with a maximum of 50MW.

To the shock of the government and the industry, 13 of the 14 second-round “losers” were willing to make a go of it, including project developers that had previously been asking for upwards of 90/MWh.

For this round, the 110/MWh bonus will run until April 2015. At least nine of those contracts have been given the go-ahead, while the other four are sorting out connection arrangements.

Those directly contracted projects are still waiting for the comptroller and auditor-general’s office to finish analysing the contracts for approval, after which they can be signed. How long that might take is unknown, and the Ministry of Industry and Energy has no power to speed things up.

There is another area, however, where it has made things happen. Almost all of the projects have been waiting on environmental permitting. The Environment Ministry, has been trying to impose stringent guidelines, such as ¬requiring that turbines be kept at least 3km from homes.

Under pressure from Méndez and the industry, Dinama has apparently agreed to soften these demands, at least for the ten or so projects under review. Future projects may yet face strict regulations.

Logistical complications also loom, including limited port access in the face of high demand.

Taken together, the delays will make it difficult for developers to reap any of the benefits of the 110/MWh bonus, which the industry admits is vital to making low-rate projects a reality.

Tabaré Pagliano of Sowitec, which has projects in both processes, agrees that the bonus “is critical”; without it, he says, they cannot be done. Pagliano believes wind farms need to be operating for at least 18 months during the bonus period to make them viable, although anything is better than nothing: “The fruit will be more sweet or less sweet; it will be sweet. The problem is if you can’t get any. Then it will be sour.”

Source:  Merco Press | en.mercopress.com | 18 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: