LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Protest at Pattern Energy Tuesday in La Jolla: Coalition of community groups outraged by U.S. Interior Secretary’s decision to approve wind turbines in Ocotillo 

Credit:  East County Magazine, eastcountymagazine.org 14 May 2012 ~~

A coalition of environmentalists, tribes, and residents opposed to the Ocotillo Express industrial wind facility will hold a news conference Tuesday, May 15 at 2 p.m. in front of the La Jolla offices of developer Pattern Energy (4225 Executive Square, La Jolla) to explain to the public why they cannot accept Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s decision to approve the project–and why they will continue their opposition.

The public is welcome to stand in solidarity with Native Americans, residents and environmental groups seeking justice. (Map to Pattern’s La Jolla office: http://tinyurl.com/PatternLaJolla.)

Although the project was approved by the Imperial County Supervisors on April 25, Pattern Energy, which seeks to put 112 giant wind turbines on three sides of the desert community of Ocotillo, had to wait for the Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, to sign the Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD was issued on Friday, May 11, approving the project.

“It came as a devastating blow to many who live in and love the desert and the history it contains. It seems Mr. Salazar doesn’t understand or doesn’t care that this project will cause irreparable harm to sensitive desert habitat and destroy land and view sheds which are sacred to Native Americans as well as destroying the quality of life for local residents,” a press release issued by the coalition states.

The text of the Record of Decision recognizes that “. . . many tribes attach religious and cultural significance to the project site and the broader landscape, and it also recognizes that the project being approved will adversely affect those resources.”(Record of Decision p.24) However, it rationalizes that there are other considerations and that the need to produce renewable energy is the justification for disregarding the heritage of the Native Americans, as well as the health and safety of residents and the scenic and recreational value of previously protected public lands.

“It ignores the fact that during the review process many letters and speakers pointed out that there are practical ways to achieve that goal without destroying the desert. The mitigation measures to protect the historical and cultural resources are woefully inadequate; the wisest thing to do will be not to disturb them,” opponents’ press release states.

Until the ROD was issued, the area where the turbines will be built was classified by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a limited use area, due to the presence of cultural resources as well as sensitive plant and animal species. Motorized vehicles could only travel on designated roads and it was forbidden to move rocks around.

With the stroke of a pen, the area can now be bulldozed to dig foundations 25 to 35 feet deep and 70 to 80 feet in diameter to accommodate 112 wind turbines over 440 feet tall as well as 42 miles of new roads.

Those speaking and answering questions at the press conference Tuesday will include members of the Quechan and Viejas tribes, Ocotillo and other Imperial County residents and members of environmental organizations such as the Desert Protective Council and the Anza Borrego Foundation.

Curiously, the final project approval document says the project will produce power for only 25,000 homes – even though Pattern claimed it would power 130,000 homes when it touted project benefits to win support from Imperial County’s Supervisors and Planning Commission. No explanation for the reduction of 105,000 homes has been offered, raising a question of whether the project is viable and why taxpayer dollars in subsidies were approved for the already controversial project.

There will also be an earlier news conference on the same day in El Centro (at 9 a.m. on the west side of the Imperial County Courthouse located at Main and 11th Street.)

Source:  East County Magazine, eastcountymagazine.org 14 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky