[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Falmouth turbine compromise OK’d 

Credit:  By Sean Teehan, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 9 May 2012 ~~

FALMOUTH – Wind turbines loomed heavily in town Monday night as selectmen and board of health members at separate meetings voted on measures meant to address residents’ health concerns.

Selectmen voted in favor of shutting down Wind 1, one of the town’s two 1.65-megawatt turbines off Blacksmith Shop Road, from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. each day.

Stopping Wind 1’s operation for 12 hours each day represents a compromise between the town and some people who live near the turbines and for more than a year have complained of nausea, vertigo and other health problems, said Mary Pat Flynn, chairman of the board of selectmen.

Mitigation efforts began last month when the Cambridge-based Consensus Building Institute, the firm hired by selectmen, began working with stakeholders – abutters, anti- and pro-turbine people and town officials – to gauge opinions of possible solutions. Residents opposed to the turbines wanted them turned off completely, Flynn said.

Next week, the firm will start the process of nominating people to serve on a committee responsible for making recommendations to selectmen. Shutting off Wind 1 for half of each day could begin as early as two weeks from now, Flynn said.

However, this action will further affect the turbines’ revenue stream, which already dropped when selectmen ordered they shut off when they reach 23 mph or more, said Falmouth Wastewater Superintendent Gerald Potamis, who oversees the turbines.

“If they run half the time, they only produce … half the power and only produce half the revenue,” Potamis said.

The action does not go far enough, said Falmouth resident Malcolm Donald, a Wind 2 abutter.

“It escapes me why they’re not shutting down Wind 2 from 7 (p.m.) to 7 (a.m.)” too, Donald said on Tuesday. “It’s a start for entering into the consensus building, (but) the consensus building can drag on for months if not years.”

Rather than attend Monday’s selectmen’s meeting, Donald went to the board of health’s meeting, where members scheduled a public hearing for 7 p.m. May 24 to hear comments about the turbines’ alleged health effects.

“We made a decision last night that we would set up a hearing “» to allow folks who believe they’re being affected by the turbines to submit written testimony,” said board member Stephen Rafferty on Tuesday.

Some people who attended the board of health meeting asserted that an abutter to the turbines recently attempted suicide because of ailments caused by the turbines, but board members cut off that discussion when those making the claim could not authenticate it, Rafferty said.

Board of health members will use testimony submitted to them as guidelines in deciding whether they should order an emergency shutdown of the turbines, said board member Jared Goldstone..

“I think it’s something that’s been building for a while,” said Goldstone, who added that state officials at the Department of Environmental Protection have been largely mute in responding to town requests for guidance. “We have written letters to the state that haven’t received direct replies.”

Residents who submit written testimony before the hearing – specifically about negative health effects resulting from exposure to turbines – may summarize their points in front of the board, Goldstone said.

The board of health will accept written testimony until May 31.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Sean Teehan, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 9 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon